哮喘患者对吸入药物的满意度

Patient Satisfaction With Inhaled Medication for Asthma.

作者信息

Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Kumari Raman, Grover Sandeep

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2018 Jul;63(7):859-864. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05544. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare treatment satisfaction with inhaled medications among asthmatics using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) or a dry-powder inhaler (DPI), and to correlate satisfaction with treatment adherence, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation.

METHODS

Spirometry, fraction of expired nitric oxide (F), and asthma control were assessed in 200 adult subjects with asthma (69 men, 131 women) using MDI or DPI. Treatment satisfaction with inhaled therapy was assessed with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) in 4 domains: Effectiveness, Side Effects, Convenience, and Global Satisfaction. The Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) was used to evaluate adherence to treatment.

RESULTS

There were 115 and 85 subjects with asthma, using MDI and DPI, respectively. More MDI users (40.9%) had well-controlled asthma as compared to DPI users (17.6%). MDI users had greater treatment adherence and better TSQM domain scores for Effectiveness, Convenience, and Global Satisfaction than did DPI users. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed no significant association between MDI/DPI use and TSQM domain scores. TSQM Convenience and Global Satisfaction domain scores were significantly correlated with MAQ scores (Spearman's coefficients 0.211 and 0.218, = .003 and = .002, respectively). There was no significant correlation between any TSQM domain score and pulmonary function or F concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

MDIs were associated with better disease control and treatment adherence among subjects with asthma. Both MDI and DPI are likely to provide equivalent treatment satisfaction.

摘要

背景

我们试图比较使用定量吸入器(MDI)或干粉吸入器(DPI)的哮喘患者对吸入药物的治疗满意度,并将满意度与治疗依从性、肺功能和气道炎症相关联。

方法

对200名成年哮喘患者(69名男性,131名女性)使用MDI或DPI进行肺活量测定、呼出一氧化氮分数(F)和哮喘控制评估。使用药物治疗满意度问卷(TSQM)在有效性、副作用、便利性和总体满意度4个领域评估对吸入治疗的治疗满意度。使用药物依从性问卷(MAQ)评估治疗依从性。

结果

分别有115名和85名哮喘患者使用MDI和DPI。与使用DPI的患者(17.6%)相比,更多使用MDI的患者(40.9%)哮喘得到良好控制。MDI使用者比DPI使用者有更高的治疗依从性,并且在有效性、便利性和总体满意度方面有更好的TSQM领域得分。多变量线性回归分析显示使用MDI/DPI与TSQM领域得分之间无显著关联。TSQM便利性和总体满意度领域得分与MAQ得分显著相关(Spearman系数分别为0.211和0.218,P分别为0.003和0.002)。任何TSQM领域得分与肺功能或F浓度之间均无显著相关性。

结论

MDI与哮喘患者更好的疾病控制和治疗依从性相关。MDI和DPI都可能提供同等的治疗满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索