Downes Kenneth, Tran Khoa D, Stoeger Christopher G, Chamberlain Winston
Division of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Casey Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Vision Research Laboratory, Lions VisionGift, Portland, OR.
Cornea. 2018 Jun;37(6):698-704. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001588.
Evaluation of cumulative Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty endothelial cell loss (ECL) from preparation through injection using 2 different glass injectors.
Eighteen Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts with "S" stamps were prepared by eye bank technicians. Nine grafts were assigned to injection with a modified glass Jones tube injector with a 2.4-mm opening and 9 were assigned to injection with the DORC glass pipette injector (<1.5-mm opening). The grafts were prepared and loaded into the injectors using the standard surgical technique, ejected onto a bed of viscoelastic on a glass slide, and unscrolled using viscoelastic. The grafts were stained with the vital dye Calcein-AM, then digitally imaged and analyzed using FIJI. The percentage of ECL was calculated by measuring the area of nonfluorescent pixels and dividing it by the total graft area pixels. A statistical comparison was performed using a 2-tailed unpaired t test.
Grafts injected using the DORC injector versus Jones tube injector had ECL of 29.2% ± 8.5% [95% confidence interval (CI)] versus 23.0% ± 5.1% (95% CI), respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.17); however, the patterns of ECL on the grafts was different between injectors. Peripheral ECL caused by trephination and surgeon grasp sites accounted for 7.5% ± 1.2% (95% CI).
There was no statistical difference in ECL between the 2 injectors. There were characteristic differences in patterns of ECL seen between injectors, which may be clinically relevant and indicate the types of stress that grafts are exposed to during passage through various injectors.
评估使用两种不同玻璃注射器从制备到注射过程中Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术的累积内皮细胞丢失(ECL)情况。
眼库技术人员制备了18个带有“S”标记的Descemet膜内皮角膜移植片。9个移植片用开口为2.4毫米的改良玻璃琼斯管注射器进行注射,9个移植片用开口小于1.5毫米的DORC玻璃移液管注射器进行注射。使用标准手术技术制备移植片并装入注射器,将其喷射到载玻片上的粘弹性物质床上,并用粘弹性物质展开。移植片用活性染料钙黄绿素-AM染色,然后使用FIJI进行数字成像和分析。通过测量非荧光像素的面积并将其除以移植片总面积像素来计算ECL的百分比。使用双尾非配对t检验进行统计学比较。
使用DORC注射器与琼斯管注射器注射的移植片的ECL分别为29.2%±8.5%[95%置信区间(CI)]和23.0%±5.1%(95%CI)。这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.17);然而,不同注射器注射的移植片上ECL的模式不同。由环切术和外科医生抓取部位引起的周边ECL占7.5%±1.2%(95%CI)。
两种注射器在ECL方面无统计学差异。不同注射器注射的移植片上ECL模式存在特征性差异,这可能具有临床相关性,并表明移植片在通过各种注射器过程中所承受的应力类型。