Yoon Chi S, Kim Chang G, Kim Hoon, Kim Kyu N
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center, Daejeon, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(12):e0168. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010168.
This study aimed to present a simple, fast, and safe technique, called freestyle perforator-based peninsular flap (FPBPF), for pressure sore reconstruction.Among the 21 patients who underwent pressure sore reconstruction between May 2013 and October 2016, 12 patients (Group A) and 9 patients (Group B) were subjected to perforator-based island flap (PBIF) and FPBPF, respectively. We retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed the data of both groups.All flaps completely survived in both groups. No significant differences were found in patient demographics, complications, hospital stay, and follow-up period. The mean arc of rotation (102.50 ± 17.645° vs 83.33 ± 14.142°; P = .01), mean flap harvest time (35.83 ± 2.552 minutes vs 20.88 ± 1.763 minutes; P < .001), and mean operative time (145.41 ± 6.788 minutes vs 131.66 ± 10.770 minutes; P = .002) were significantly decreased in Group B compared with Group A.The FPBPF is a simpler and faster technique than the PBIF. FPBPF is a good modality with a few complications for sore reconstruction.
本研究旨在介绍一种简单、快速且安全的技术,即基于自由式穿支的半岛皮瓣(FPBPF),用于压疮重建。在2013年5月至2016年10月期间接受压疮重建的21例患者中,分别有12例患者(A组)和9例患者(B组)接受了基于穿支的岛状皮瓣(PBIF)和FPBPF。我们对两组数据进行了回顾性分析和统计学分析。两组皮瓣均完全存活。两组患者在人口统计学、并发症、住院时间和随访期方面均未发现显著差异。与A组相比,B组的平均旋转弧度(102.50±17.645° vs 83.33±14.142°;P = 0.01)、平均皮瓣切取时间(35.83±2.552分钟 vs 20.88±1.763分钟;P < 0.001)和平均手术时间(145.41±6.788分钟 vs 131.66±10.770分钟;P = 0.002)均显著降低。FPBPF是一种比PBIF更简单、更快的技术。FPBPF对于压疮重建是一种并发症较少的良好术式。