Suppr超能文献

大规模发放阿奇霉素后儿童死亡率:尼日尔 PRET 集群随机试验的二次分析。

Childhood Mortality After Mass Distribution of Azithromycin: A Secondary Analysis of the PRET Cluster-randomized Trial in Niger.

机构信息

From the Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Programme FSS/Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, Programme National de Santé Oculaire, Niamey, Niger.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Nov;37(11):1082-1086. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001992.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass distributions of azithromycin for trachoma have been associated with secondary benefits, including reductions in child mortality.

METHODS

In the Partnership for the Rapid Elimination of Trachoma cluster-randomized trial in Niger, 24 communities were randomized to annual treatment of everyone and 24 communities were randomized to biannual treatment of children under 12 for 3 years (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00792922). Treatment was a single dose of directly observed oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg up to 1 g in adults). Vital status was assessed during annual census and monitoring visits. In this prespecified secondary analysis, we compared the mortality rate among children 6 months to less than 5 years of age by treatment arm using negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

Among children 6 months to less than 5 years of age, 404 deaths occurred during the study period. The mortality rate was 35.6 deaths per 1000 person-years (231 deaths, 95% CI: 30.9-40.9) in the annual arm and 29.0 deaths per 1000 person-years (173 deaths, 95% CI: 24.8-33.8) in the biannual arm. The mortality rate ratio comparing children in the biannual arm to the annual arm was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66-1.00, P = 0.07; primary outcome). The mortality rate ratio comparing children who died from infectious causes in the biannual arm to the annual arm was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.57-0.94; P = 0.02). No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial found a nonsignificant 19% decrease in mortality among children 6 months to less than 5 years of age who received biannual azithromycin compared with children who received annual azithromycin. This study was conducted in a high mortality, trachoma-endemic area; thus, results may be specific to this environment only. In addition, the trial was neither designed nor powered to detect a mortality effect, and we cannot rule out the possibility that mortality differences resulted from bias.

摘要

背景

大规模使用阿奇霉素治疗沙眼与次要益处相关,包括降低儿童死亡率。

方法

在尼日尔的快速消除沙眼伙伴关系集群随机试验中,24 个社区被随机分为每年对所有人进行治疗,24 个社区被随机分为每两年对 12 岁以下儿童进行治疗,持续 3 年(clinicaltrials.gov,NCT00792922)。治疗方法是单次口服阿奇霉素(成人 20mg/kg,最大剂量 1g)。在每年的人口普查和监测访问期间评估生命状态。在这项预先指定的次要分析中,我们使用负二项回归比较了治疗组 6 个月至不到 5 岁儿童的死亡率。

结果

在研究期间,6 个月至不到 5 岁的儿童中发生了 404 例死亡。在每年治疗组中,死亡率为每 1000 人年 35.6 例死亡(231 例死亡,95%CI:30.9-40.9),在每两年治疗组中,死亡率为每 1000 人年 29.0 例死亡(173 例死亡,95%CI:24.8-33.8)。与每年治疗组相比,每两年治疗组儿童的死亡率比值为 0.81(95%CI:0.66-1.00,P=0.07;主要结局)。与每年治疗组相比,每两年治疗组死于感染性疾病的儿童的死亡率比值为 0.73(95%CI:0.57-0.94;P=0.02)。没有报告不良事件。

结论

这项集群随机试验的二次分析发现,与每年接受阿奇霉素治疗的儿童相比,每两年接受阿奇霉素治疗的 6 个月至不到 5 岁儿童的死亡率降低了 19%,但无统计学意义。这项研究是在高死亡率、沙眼流行地区进行的;因此,结果可能仅适用于这种环境。此外,该试验既不是为了检测死亡率效应而设计的,也没有为此提供足够的效力,我们不能排除死亡率差异是由偏倚引起的可能性。

相似文献

5
Azithromycin to Reduce Childhood Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1583-1592. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715474.

引用本文的文献

2
Secondary Effects from Mass Azithromycin Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Aug 15;107(4):904-911. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0134. Print 2022 Oct 12.
3
Mass drug administration of antibacterials: weighing the evidence regarding benefits and risks.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 30;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00998-6.
5
Single-dose azithromycin for child growth in Burkina Faso: a randomized controlled trial.
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02601-7.
6
Safety of azithromycin in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;76(12):1709-1721. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02956-3. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Antibiotics for trachoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Targeting Trachoma Treatment to Children.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;64(6):743-750. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw810.
5
Antibiotic Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae after Azithromycin Distribution for Trachoma.
J Trop Med. 2015;2015:917370. doi: 10.1155/2015/917370. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
7
Increased carriage of macrolide-resistant fecal E. coli following mass distribution of azithromycin for trachoma control.
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):1105-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu062. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
8
Is there evidence for resistance of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis to azithromycin after mass treatment for trachoma control?
J Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 1;210(1):65-71. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu046. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
9
Community risk factors for ocular Chlamydia infection in Niger: pre-treatment results from a cluster-randomized trachoma trial.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(4):e1586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001586. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验