• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mass drug administration of antibacterials: weighing the evidence regarding benefits and risks.抗菌药物的群体给药:权衡利弊证据
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 30;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00998-6.
2
Prevalence of Active and Latent Yaws in the Solomon Islands 18 Months after Azithromycin Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma.阿奇霉素大规模给药治疗沙眼18个月后所罗门群岛活动性和潜伏性雅司病的患病率
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 23;10(8):e0004927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004927. eCollection 2016 Aug.
3
Impact of mass drug administration of azithromycin for trachoma elimination on prevalence and azithromycin resistance of genital infection.大规模使用阿奇霉素治疗沙眼对生殖器感染的流行和阿奇霉素耐药性的影响。
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Nov;95(7):522-528. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053938. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
4
Secondary Effects from Mass Azithromycin Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.大剂量阿奇霉素使用的次要效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Aug 15;107(4):904-911. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0134. Print 2022 Oct 12.
5
A cross-sectional study of 'yaws' in districts of Ghana which have previously undertaken azithromycin mass drug administration for trachoma control.对加纳此前曾开展阿奇霉素群体给药以控制沙眼的地区进行的“雅司病”横断面研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jan 29;9(1):e0003496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003496. eCollection 2015 Jan.
6
Mass distribution of azithromycin for trachoma control is associated with increased risk of azithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage in young children 6 months after treatment.大规模分发阿奇霉素用于控制沙眼与治疗后 6 个月儿童耐阿奇霉素肺炎链球菌携带率增加相关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;56(11):1519-26. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit137. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Impact of Community Mass Treatment with Azithromycin for Trachoma Elimination on the Prevalence of Yaws.阿奇霉素社区群体治疗消除沙眼对雅司病患病率的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Aug 4;9(8):e0003988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003988. eCollection 2015.
8
Antimicrobial Resistance Following Azithromycin Mass Drug Administration: Potential Surveillance Strategies to Assess Public Health Impact.阿奇霉素大规模药物治疗后的抗菌药物耐药性:评估公共卫生影响的潜在监测策略。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 17;70(7):1501-1508. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz893.
9
Effectiveness of azithromycin mass drug administration on trachoma: a systematic review.阿奇霉素群体药物治疗沙眼的效果:系统评价。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Sep 16;134(24):2944-2953. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001717.
10
Population-based coverage survey results following the mass drug administration of azithromycin for the treatment of trachoma in Amhara, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区大规模使用阿奇霉素治疗沙眼的基于人群的覆盖情况调查结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Feb 16;12(2):e0006270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006270. eCollection 2018 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.阿奇霉素群体给药试验:为未来研究和指南提供信息的分析
Infect Dis Poverty. 2025 Jul 21;14(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40249-025-01322-8.
2
The role of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in the effect of Azithromycin on Child Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CHAT Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.季节性疟疾化学预防在阿奇霉素对儿童死亡率影响中的作用:CHAT 整群随机临床试验的二次分析
medRxiv. 2025 May 2:2025.04.30.25326740. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.30.25326740.
3
Pre-vaccination carriage prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes among internally displaced people in Somaliland: a cross-sectional study.索马里兰境内流离失所者肺炎链球菌血清型的疫苗接种前携带率:一项横断面研究。
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2024 Dec 5;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41479-024-00148-6.
4
Neonatal Azithromycin Exposure and Childhood Growth: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.新生儿阿奇霉素暴露与儿童期生长:一项随机对照试验的长期随访。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jul 16;111(3):698-702. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0016. Print 2024 Sep 4.
5
Mass Azithromycin Distribution to Prevent Child Mortality in Burkina Faso: The CHAT Randomized Clinical Trial.大规模阿奇霉素分发预防布基纳法索儿童死亡:CHAT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 13;331(6):482-490. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27393.
6
Temporal Trends in Phenotypic Macrolide and Nonmacrolide Resistance for Streptococcus pneumoniae Nasopharyngeal Samples Up to 36 Months after Mass Azithromycin Administration in a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Niger.尼日尔大规模阿奇霉素给药后 36 个月内鼻咽拭子肺炎链球菌表型大环内酯类和非大环内酯类耐药的时间趋势:一项集群随机试验
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Oct 2;109(5):1107-1112. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0431. Print 2023 Nov 1.
7
Prevalence of active trachoma infection and associated factors post-war resettled population in raya kobo districts, North East Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study in 2022.埃塞俄比亚东北部拉亚科博地区战后重新安置人口中活动性沙眼感染的患病率及相关因素:2022年一项基于社区的横断面研究
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 6;6(8):e1486. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1486. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Uses of mathematical modeling to estimate the impact of mass drug administration of antibiotics on antimicrobial resistance within and between communities.利用数学模型评估抗生素群体给药对社区内部及社区之间抗菌药物耐药性的影响。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 30;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00997-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Azithromycin for the prevention of rehospitalisation and death among Kenyan children being discharged from hospital: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial.阿奇霉素预防肯尼亚出院儿童再住院和死亡的效果:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Nov;9(11):e1569-e1578. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00347-8. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
2
Development of vaccines and antivirals for combating viral pandemics.疫苗和抗病毒药物的研发以应对病毒大流行。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;4(12):1128-1133. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00658-w.
3
Macrolide and Nonmacrolide Resistance with Mass Azithromycin Distribution.大剂量阿奇霉素分发与大环内酯类和非大环内酯类耐药性。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1941-1950. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002606.
4
Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Use of Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).COVID-19 住院患者使用羟氯喹(无论是否联合使用阿奇霉素)导致 QT 间期延长的风险。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;5(9):1036-1041. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1834.
5
QT interval evaluation associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine with combined use of azithromycin among hospitalised children positive for coronavirus disease 2019.2019冠状病毒病检测呈阳性的住院儿童中,羟氯喹与阿奇霉素联合使用相关的QT间期评估。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Oct;30(10):1482-1485. doi: 10.1017/S1047951120002425. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Safety of azithromycin in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿奇霉素在儿科中的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;76(12):1709-1721. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02956-3. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Strong association between adolescent obesity and consumption of macrolides in Europe and the USA: An ecological study.欧洲和美国青少年肥胖与大环内酯类药物消费之间的强关联:一项生态学研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Oct;13(10):1517-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
8
Serotype Profile of Nasopharyngeal Isolates of Obtained from Children in Burkina Faso before and after Mass Administration of Azithromycin.布基纳法索儿童在大规模使用阿奇霉素前后鼻咽分离株血清型分布特征。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug;103(2):679-683. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0944. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Experience With Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Implications for QT Interval Monitoring.羟氯喹和阿奇霉素在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行中的应用经验:对 QT 间期监测的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e017144. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017144. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin.COVID-19 患者接受羟氯喹/阿奇霉素治疗后出现 QT 间期延长和尖端扭转型室性心动过速。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1425-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 12.

抗菌药物的群体给药:权衡利弊证据

Mass drug administration of antibacterials: weighing the evidence regarding benefits and risks.

作者信息

Rolfe Robert J, Shaikh Hassaan, Tillekeratne L Gayani

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 30;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00998-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40249-022-00998-6
PMID:35773722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9243730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass drug administration (MDA) is a strategy to improve health at the population level through widespread delivery of medicine in a community. We surveyed the literature to summarize the benefits and potential risks associated with MDA of antibacterials, focusing predominantly on azithromycin as it has the greatest evidence base.

MAIN BODY

High-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that MDA-azithromycin is effective in reducing the prevalence of infection due to yaws and trachoma. In addition, RCTs suggest that MDA-azithromycin reduces under-five mortality in certain low-resource settings that have high childhood mortality rates at baseline. This reduction in mortality appears to be sustained over time with twice-yearly MDA-azithromycin, with the greatest effect observed in children < 1 year of age. In addition, observational data suggest that infections such as skin and soft tissue infections, rheumatic heart disease, acute respiratory illness, diarrheal illness, and malaria may all be treated by azithromycin and thus incidentally impacted by MDA-azithromycin. However, the mechanism by which MDA-azithromycin reduces childhood mortality remains unclear. Verbal autopsies performed in MDA-azithromycin childhood mortality studies have produced conflicting data and are underpowered to answer this question. In addition to benefits, there are several important risks associated with MDA-azithromycin. Direct adverse effects potentially resulting from MDA-azithromycin include gastrointestinal side effects, idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, cardiovascular side effects, and increase in chronic diseases such as asthma and obesity. Antibacterial resistance is also a risk associated with MDA-azithromycin and has been reported for both gram-positive and enteric organisms. Further, there is the risk for cross-resistance with other antibacterial agents, especially clindamycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence shows that MDA-azithromycin programs may be beneficial for reducing trachoma, yaws, and mortality in children < 5 years of age in certain under-resourced settings. However, there are significant potential risks that need to be considered when deciding how, when, and where to implement these programs. Robust systems to monitor benefits as well as adverse effects and antibacterial resistance are warranted in communities where MDA-azithromycin programs are implemented.

摘要

背景

群体药物给药(MDA)是一种通过在社区广泛分发药物来改善人群健康状况的策略。我们对文献进行了调研,以总结与抗菌药物群体药物给药相关的益处和潜在风险,主要聚焦于阿奇霉素,因为其有最充分的证据基础。

主体内容

随机对照试验(RCT)的高质量证据表明,群体药物给药阿奇霉素在降低雅司病和沙眼感染患病率方面是有效的。此外,随机对照试验表明,在某些基线儿童死亡率较高的资源匮乏地区,群体药物给药阿奇霉素可降低五岁以下儿童死亡率。随着每年两次的群体药物给药阿奇霉素,这种死亡率的降低似乎会随着时间持续存在,在1岁以下儿童中观察到的效果最为显著。此外,观察性数据表明,诸如皮肤和软组织感染、风湿性心脏病、急性呼吸道疾病、腹泻病和疟疾等感染都可能用阿奇霉素治疗,因此群体药物给药阿奇霉素可能会对其产生附带影响。然而,群体药物给药阿奇霉素降低儿童死亡率的机制仍不清楚。在群体药物给药阿奇霉素儿童死亡率研究中进行的死因推断得出了相互矛盾的数据,且不足以回答这个问题。除了益处之外,群体药物给药阿奇霉素还存在一些重要风险。群体药物给药阿奇霉素可能导致的直接不良反应包括胃肠道副作用、特发性肥厚性幽门狭窄、心血管副作用以及哮喘和肥胖等慢性疾病的增加。抗菌药物耐药性也是群体药物给药阿奇霉素相关的风险,革兰氏阳性菌和肠道菌都有相关报道。此外,还存在与其他抗菌药物交叉耐药的风险,尤其是克林霉素。

结论

证据表明,群体药物给药阿奇霉素项目可能有利于在某些资源匮乏地区降低沙眼、雅司病以及五岁以下儿童的死亡率。然而,在决定如何、何时以及何地实施这些项目时,需要考虑重大的潜在风险。在实施群体药物给药阿奇霉素项目的社区,有必要建立强有力的系统来监测益处、不良反应和抗菌药物耐药性。