Department of Medical Sciences, Geriatric Unit and Laboratory of Gerontology and Geriatrics, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
Department of Basic Medicine, Neurodegenerative Disease Unit, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(3):993-1012. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170963.
Frailty, a critical intermediate status of the aging process that is at increased risk for negative health-related events, includes physical, cognitive, and psychosocial domains or phenotypes. Cognitive frailty is a condition recently defined by operationalized criteria describing coexisting physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with two proposed subtypes: potentially reversible cognitive frailty (physical frailty/MCI) and reversible cognitive frailty (physical frailty/pre-MCI subjective cognitive decline). In the present article, we reviewed the framework for the definition, different models, and the current epidemiology of cognitive frailty, also describing neurobiological mechanisms, and exploring the possible prevention of the cognitive frailty progression. Several studies suggested a relevant heterogeneity with prevalence estimates ranging 1.0-22.0% (10.7-22.0% in clinical-based settings and 1.0-4.4% in population-based settings). Cross-sectional and longitudinal population-based studies showed that different cognitive frailty models may be associated with increased risk of functional disability, worsened quality of life, hospitalization, mortality, incidence of dementia, vascular dementia, and neurocognitive disorders. The operationalization of clinical constructs based on cognitive impairment related to physical causes (physical frailty, motor function decline, or other physical factors) appears to be interesting for dementia secondary prevention given the increased risk for progression to dementia of these clinical entities. Multidomain interventions have the potential to be effective in preventing cognitive frailty. In the near future, we need to establish more reliable clinical and research criteria, using different operational definitions for frailty and cognitive impairment, and useful clinical, biological, and imaging markers to implement intervention programs targeted to improve frailty, so preventing also late-life cognitive disorders.
衰弱是衰老过程中的一个关键中间状态,处于这种状态的个体健康相关不良事件的风险增加,衰弱包含身体、认知和心理社会领域或表型。认知衰弱是一种最近通过操作性标准定义的状态,描述了共存的身体衰弱和轻度认知障碍(MCI),有两种提出的亚型:潜在可逆转的认知衰弱(身体衰弱/MCI)和可逆转的认知衰弱(身体衰弱/pre-MCI 主观认知下降)。在本文中,我们回顾了认知衰弱的定义、不同模型和当前流行病学框架,还描述了神经生物学机制,并探索了认知衰弱进展的可能预防措施。几项研究表明,认知衰弱的患病率存在显著异质性,估计范围为 1.0-22.0%(临床环境中为 10.7-22.0%,人群环境中为 1.0-4.4%)。横断面和纵向人群研究表明,不同的认知衰弱模型可能与功能障碍风险增加、生活质量恶化、住院、死亡率、痴呆、血管性痴呆和神经认知障碍的发生率增加相关。基于与身体原因相关的认知障碍(身体衰弱、运动功能下降或其他身体因素)的临床概念的操作性定义,对于痴呆的二级预防似乎很有意义,因为这些临床实体向痴呆进展的风险增加。多领域干预有可能预防认知衰弱。在不久的将来,我们需要建立更可靠的临床和研究标准,使用不同的衰弱和认知障碍操作性定义,以及有用的临床、生物学和影像学标志物,以实施针对改善衰弱的干预计划,从而预防老年期认知障碍。