Tieleman B Irene
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2018;72(3):55. doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2464-z. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
This article provides a brief historical perspective on the integration of physiology into the concept of the pace of life of birds, evaluates the fit of immune function into this framework, and asks what it will take to fruitfully understand immune functioning of birds in pace of life studies in the future. In the late 1970s, physiology started to seriously enter avian life history ecology, with energy as the main currency of interest, inspired by David Lack's work in the preceding decades emphasizing how food availability explained life history variation. In an effort to understand the trade-off between survival and reproduction, and specifically the mortality costs associated with hard work, in the 1980s and 1990s, other physiological phenomena entered the realm of animal ecologists, including endocrinology, oxidative stress, and immunology. Reviewing studies thus far to evaluate the role of immune function in a life history context and particularly to address the questions whether immune function (1) consistently varies with life history variation among free-living bird species and (2) mediates life history trade-offs in experiments with free-living bird species; I conclude that, unlike energy metabolism, the immune system does not closely covary with life history among species nor mediates the classical trade-offs within individuals. Instead, I propose that understanding the tremendous immunological variation uncovered among free-living birds over the past 25 years requires a paradigm shift. The paradigm should shift from viewing immune function as a costly trait involved in life history trade-offs to explicitly including the benefits of the immune system and placing it firmly in an environmental and ecological context. A first step forward will be to quantify the immunobiotic pressures presented by diverse environmental circumstances that both shape and challenge the immune system of free-living animals. Current developments in the fields of infectious wildlife diseases and host-microbe interactions provide promising steps in this direction.
本文简要回顾了生理学如何融入鸟类生活节奏概念的历史,评估了免疫功能在这一框架中的契合度,并探讨了未来如何在生活节奏研究中卓有成效地理解鸟类的免疫功能。20世纪70年代末,受大卫·拉克在前几十年强调食物可利用性如何解释生活史变异的研究启发,生理学开始正式进入鸟类生活史生态学领域,能量成为主要研究对象。为了理解生存与繁殖之间的权衡,特别是与高强度活动相关的死亡成本,在20世纪80年代和90年代,其他生理现象进入了动物生态学家的研究范围,包括内分泌学、氧化应激和免疫学。回顾迄今为止评估免疫功能在生活史背景下作用的研究,特别是解决免疫功能是否(1)在自由生活鸟类物种中随生活史变异而持续变化,以及(2)在自由生活鸟类物种实验中调节生活史权衡的问题;我得出结论,与能量代谢不同,免疫系统在物种间与生活史的相关性并不紧密,也不介导个体内部的经典权衡。相反,我认为,要理解过去25年在自由生活鸟类中发现的巨大免疫变异,需要进行范式转变。范式应从将免疫功能视为参与生活史权衡的代价高昂的特征,转变为明确纳入免疫系统的益处,并将其牢固地置于环境和生态背景中。向前迈出的第一步将是量化不同环境条件对自由生活动物免疫系统形成和挑战的免疫生物压力。野生动物传染病和宿主 - 微生物相互作用领域的当前发展为这一方向提供了有希望的进展。