• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者体重指数与年龄之比:全膝关节置换术经济有效的植入物选择指南

The ratio of patient body mass index to age: a cost-effective implant selection guideline for total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Osmani Feroz A, Bolz Nicholas, Odeh Khalid, Bearison Craig, Schwarzkopf Ran, Iorio Richard

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Disease, New York, NY, USA.

NYU College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2017 Oct 21;4(1):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.08.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2017.08.001
PMID:29564376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to develop an objective implant selection guideline based on the ratio of patient body mass index (BMI) to age in order to select implants preoperatively and reduce cost while maintaining quality. The BMI-to-age ratio can be used to distinguish patient demand and select those patients who may benefit from newer technology and higher cost implants and those who would do well with standard-demand implants.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis investigated the types of implants received by patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty from January 2012 to August 2014. Patients with a BMI-to-age ratio >0.60 were categorized as high demand and were eligible for either a high-demand implant or a standard-demand implant. Patients with a BMI-to-age ratio ≤0.60 were recognized as standard demand and would be eligible for only standard-demand implants. The actual implant received was identified and compared with the implant as predicted by the BMI-to-age ratio and potential cost savings were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 1507 operative knees were identified. The high-demand implant carries a 31% greater cost than that of a standard-demand implant. Thirty-eight of 1084 high-demand implants were placed in standard-demand knees. An additional 1.1% cost was realized with 38 standard-demand knees receiving high-demand implants and 28.6% if high-demand knees had been used in all standard-demand patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Limiting the use of high-demand implants to high-functional-demand patients based on the BMI-to-age ratio may guide the surgeon's choice in optimizing implant selection while providing value-based purchasing criteria to the selection of total knee arthroplasty implants.

摘要

背景

我们试图制定一项基于患者体重指数(BMI)与年龄之比的客观植入物选择指南,以便在术前选择植入物,在保持质量的同时降低成本。BMI与年龄之比可用于区分患者需求,选择那些可能从新技术和高成本植入物中受益的患者,以及那些使用标准需求植入物就能取得良好效果的患者。

方法

一项回顾性分析调查了2012年1月至2014年8月接受全膝关节置换术患者所使用的植入物类型。BMI与年龄之比>0.60的患者被归类为高需求患者,有资格使用高需求植入物或标准需求植入物。BMI与年龄之比≤0.60的患者被认定为标准需求患者,仅符合使用标准需求植入物的条件。确定实际使用的植入物,并与根据BMI与年龄之比预测的植入物进行比较,确定潜在的成本节约情况。

结果

共确定了1507个手术膝关节。高需求植入物的成本比标准需求植入物高31%。1084个高需求植入物中有38个被植入标准需求膝关节。38个标准需求膝关节接受高需求植入物可额外节省1.1%的成本,如果所有标准需求患者都使用高需求膝关节,则可节省28.6%的成本。

结论

根据BMI与年龄之比将高需求植入物的使用限制于高功能需求患者,可能会指导外科医生在优化植入物选择时做出选择,同时为全膝关节置换植入物的选择提供基于价值的采购标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092e/5859741/2c68ff496bdd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092e/5859741/2c68ff496bdd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092e/5859741/2c68ff496bdd/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
The ratio of patient body mass index to age: a cost-effective implant selection guideline for total knee arthroplasty.患者体重指数与年龄之比:全膝关节置换术经济有效的植入物选择指南
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Oct 21;4(1):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.08.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Knee implant standardization: an implant selection and cost reduction program.膝关节植入物标准化:一项植入物选择与成本降低计划。
Am J Knee Surg. 1998 Spring;11(2):73-9.
3
Factors influencing choice of implants in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: perspectives of surgeons and patients.全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术中影响植入物选择的因素:外科医生和患者的观点
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Apr;14(3):281-7. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90052-9.
4
Placing a price on medical device innovation: the example of total knee arthroplasty.为医疗器械创新定价:以全膝关节置换术为例。
PLoS One. 2013 May 6;8(5):e62709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062709. Print 2013.
5
Higher Frequency of Reoperation With a New Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.新型双交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换术的再手术频率更高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):62-69. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4812-5.
6
Preferred Single-Vendor Program for Total Joint Arthroplasty Implants: Surgeon Adoption, Outcomes, and Cost Savings.优选单一供应商计划用于全关节置换植入物:外科医生采用、结果和成本节约。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 7;101(15):1381-1387. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00008.
7
Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up.初次全膝关节置换中髁限制型膝关节假体的中期结果令人满意:临床和放射学随访。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Dec 2;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00561-9.
8
Implant selection and cost for total joint arthroplasty: conflict between surgeons and hospitals.全关节置换术的植入物选择与成本:外科医生与医院之间的矛盾
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Apr;457:57-63. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803372e0.
9
Outcomes of a newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty design in patients less than 50 years of age.新一代非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术设计在50岁以下患者中的疗效。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 3):S24. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.08.20.
10
Fluoroscopically Assisted Radiographs Improve Sensitivity of Detecting Loose Tibial Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.透视辅助X线片可提高翻修全膝关节置换术中检测胫骨假体松动的敏感性。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term clinical and radiological outcome of a cementless titanium-coated total knee arthroplasty system.一种非骨水泥钛涂层全膝关节置换系统的长期临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):847-853. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05091-7. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait.在全膝关节置换术中,活动平台在屈曲和轴向旋转方面是否比固定平台更好?一项基于步态的随机对照研究。
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Sep 9;20:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009. eCollection 2020 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding and Controlling Cost in Total Joint Arthroplasty.全关节置换术中的成本理解与控制
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jun;73(2):70-7.
2
Strategies and tactics for successful implementation of bundled payments: bundled payment for care improvement at a large, urban, academic medical center.成功实施捆绑支付的策略与战术:大型城市学术医疗中心的改善护理捆绑支付
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):349-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
3
Orthopedic hospital uses 'price point' strategy to lower implant costs.骨科医院采用“价格点”策略降低植入物成本。
OR Manager. 2014 Sep;30(9):22, 24-5.
4
Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection.病态肥胖:二期翻修全膝关节置换术治疗感染失败的显著危险因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 17;96(18):e154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01289.
5
New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice?新型全膝关节置换术设计:年轻患者会注意到吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):101-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3713-8.
6
Total knee arthroplasty at 15-17 years: does implant design affect outcome?15-17 岁行全膝关节置换术:假体设计是否影响疗效?
Int Orthop. 2014 Feb;38(2):235-41. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2231-8. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
Decreasing total joint implant costs and physician specific cost variation through negotiation.通过谈判降低整体关节植入物成本和医师特定成本差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):678-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
8
Orthopaedic surgeons frequently underestimate the cost of orthopaedic implants.骨科医生经常低估骨科植入物的成本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1744-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2757-x.
9
Factors influencing patients' willingness to pay for new technologies in hip and knee implants.影响髋关节和膝关节植入物新技术患者支付意愿的因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar;28(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
10
Variability in costs associated with total hip and knee replacement implants.髋关节和膝关节置换植入物相关成本的变异性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19;94(18):1693-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00355.