Suppr超能文献

肝胆胰外科的医院教学状况与医疗保险支出

Hospital Teaching Status and Medicare Expenditures for Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery.

作者信息

Chen Qinyu, Bagante Fabio, Merath Katiuscha, Idrees Jay, Beal Eliza W, Cloyd Jordan, Dillhoff Mary, Schmidt Carl, Diaz Adrian, White Susan, Pawlik Timothy M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.

Clinical, Health Information Management and Systems Division, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2969-2979. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4566-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association of hospital teaching status and overall expenditures has not been studied among patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. We sought to define the impact of hospital teaching intensity on payments and charges associated with (HPB) surgery from the payer perspective.

METHODS

Surgical patients undergoing HPB procedures were identified using 2013-2015 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) data. Hospital teaching intensity was categorized based on hospital resident-to-bed ratio: non-teaching (NTH: 0), minor teaching (minor-TH: 0-0.363), and major teaching (major-TH:  > 0.363). Risk-adjusted price-standardized Medicare payments were assessed and compared among HPB surgical patients at NTH versus major-TH.

RESULTS

A total of 8863 patients underwent HPB (NTH: n = 1239, 14.0%; minor-TH: n = 3202, 36.1%; major-TH: n = 4422, 49.9%). Patient comorbidities did not vary across hospital according to teaching intensity (p = 0.27). Mean risk-adjusted Medicare payment at a major-TH was $29,541 versus $19,345 at a NTH (Δ-payment: + $10,195; p < 0.001). Differences in Medicare payments associated with hospital teaching status persisted when the risk-adjusted price was standardized to remove social subsidies and regional variation in costs (NTH: $19,760 vs. major-TH: $28,382; Δ-payment:  + $8623). Major-TH had higher total charges submitted to Medicare versus NTH (NTH: $100,583 vs. major-TH: $120,498; Δ-charge = + $19,915), including charges for accommodations, laboratory, and blood utilization (all p < 0.05). Compared with NTH, major-TH had lower morbidity (22.6 vs. 19.0%), serious complications (13.0 vs. 10.5%) and 30-day mortality (4.8 vs. 2.3%) (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Major-TH was associated with higher Medicare expenditures than NTH among HPB surgical patients. These differences were attributable, in part, to higher submitted charges for hospital-based services. While associated with higher payments and charges, TH did have better short-term outcomes compared with NTH.

摘要

背景

在接受肝胰胆(HPB)手术的患者中,尚未对医院教学状况与总支出之间的关联进行研究。我们试图从支付方的角度确定医院教学强度对与HPB手术相关的支付和费用的影响。

方法

利用2013 - 2015年医疗保险提供者分析与审查(MEDPAR)数据确定接受HPB手术的患者。根据医院住院医师与床位的比例对医院教学强度进行分类:非教学医院(NTH:0)、小型教学医院(小型TH:0 - 0.363)和大型教学医院(大型TH:> 0.363)。对NTH与大型TH的HPB手术患者的风险调整价格标准化医疗保险支付进行评估和比较。

结果

共有8863例患者接受了HPB手术(NTH:n = 1239,14.0%;小型TH:n = 3202,36.1%;大型TH:n = 4422,49.9%)。患者的合并症在不同教学强度的医院之间没有差异(p = 0.27)。大型TH的平均风险调整医疗保险支付为29,541美元,而NTH为19,345美元(支付差异:+ 10,195美元;p < 0.001)。当风险调整价格标准化以消除社会补贴和成本的地区差异时,与医院教学状况相关的医疗保险支付差异仍然存在(NTH:19,760美元 vs. 大型TH:28,382美元;支付差异:+ 8623美元)。与NTH相比,大型TH向医疗保险提交的总费用更高(NTH:100,583美元 vs. 大型TH:120,498美元;费用差异 = + 19,915美元),包括住宿、实验室和血液使用费用(所有p < 0.05)。与NTH相比,大型TH的发病率较低(22.6%对19.0%)、严重并发症较少(13.0%对10.5%)和30天死亡率较低(4.8%对2.3%)(所有p < 0.05)。

结论

在HPB手术患者中,大型TH与比NTH更高的医疗保险支出相关。这些差异部分归因于医院服务提交的费用更高。虽然与更高的支付和费用相关,但与NTH相比,教学医院确实有更好的短期结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验