Suppr超能文献

腰骶部移行椎及相关椎体计数的综述。

A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration.

作者信息

Lian Jayson, Levine Nicole, Cho Woojin

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, 3400 Bainbridge Ave, 6th Fl., Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2018 May;27(5):995-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5554-8. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review the current literature on methods of accurate numeration of vertebral segments in patients with Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs). LSTVs are a common congenital anomaly of the L5-S1 junction. While their clinical significance has been debated, unquestionable is the need for their identification prior to spinal surgery. We hypothesize that there are no reliable landmarks by which we can accurately number transitional vertebrae, and thus a full spinal radiograph is required.

METHODS

A Pubmed and EMBASE search using various combinations of specific key words including "LSTV", "lumbosacral transitional vertebrae", "count", "vertebral numbering", and "number" was performed.

RESULTS

The gold standard for spinal segment numeration in patients with LSTV remains whole spine imaging and counting caudally, starting from C2. If whole spine imaging is not available, the use of the iliac crest tangent sign on coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has fairly reliable sensitivity and specificity (81 and 64-88%, respectively) for accurate numeration of LSTV. The role of paraspinal anatomic markers such as the right renal artery, superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation, and conus medullaris, for identification of vertebral levels is unreliable and should not be used.

CONCLUSIONS

A sagittal whole spine view should be added as a scout view when patients obtain lumbar MRI to standardize the vertebral numbering technique. To date, there has been no other method for accurate numeration of a transitional vertebral segment, other than counting caudally from C2. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

目的

回顾目前关于准确计数腰骶部移行椎(LSTV)患者椎体节段方法的文献。LSTV是L5 - S1交界处常见的先天性异常。虽然其临床意义一直存在争议,但在脊柱手术前识别它们的必要性是毋庸置疑的。我们假设不存在可靠的标志来准确计数移行椎,因此需要一张全脊柱X线片。

方法

使用包括“LSTV”、“腰骶部移行椎”、“计数”、“椎体编号”和“编号”等特定关键词的各种组合在PubMed和EMBASE上进行检索。

结果

LSTV患者脊柱节段计数的金标准仍然是全脊柱成像,并从C2开始向尾端计数。如果无法进行全脊柱成像,在冠状面磁共振成像(MRI)上使用髂嵴切线征对准确计数LSTV具有相当可靠的敏感性和特异性(分别为81%和64 - 88%)。诸如右肾动脉、肠系膜上动脉、主动脉分叉和脊髓圆锥等椎旁解剖标志在识别椎体水平方面不可靠,不应使用。

结论

当患者进行腰椎MRI检查时,应增加矢状面全脊柱视图作为定位视图,以规范椎体编号技术。迄今为止,除了从C2向尾端计数外,尚无其他准确计数移行椎体节段的方法。这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中获取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验