1 Department of Health and Nutrition, Louis Bolk Institute , Bunnik, The Netherlands .
2 Department of Nursing, Mid-Sweden University , Sundsvall, Sweden .
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jul;24(7):684-693. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0388. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMS/PMDD) bother a substantial number of women. Homeopathy seems a promising treatment, but it needs investigation using reliable study designs. The feasibility of organizing an international randomized pragmatic trial on a homeopathic add-on treatment (usual care [UC] + HT) compared with UC alone was evaluated.
A multicenter, randomized, controlled pragmatic trial with parallel groups.
SETTINGS/LOCATION: The study was organized in general and private homeopathic practices in the Netherlands and Sweden and in an outpatient university clinic in Germany.
Women diagnosed as having PMS/PMDD, based on prospective daily rating by the daily record of severity of problems (DRSP) during a period of 2 months, were included and randomized.
Women were to receive UC + HT or UC for 4 months. Homeopathic medicine selection was according to a previously tested prognostic questionnaire and electronic algorithm. Usual care was as provided by the women's general practitioner according to their preferences.
Before and after treatment, the women completed diaries (DRSP), the measure yourself concerns and well-being, and other questionnaires. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed.
In Germany, the study could not proceed because of legal limitations. In Sweden, recruitment proved extremely difficult. In the Netherlands and Sweden, 60 women were randomized (UC + HT: 28; UC: 32), data of 47/46 women were analyzed (ITT/PP). After 4 months, relative mean change of DRSP scores in the UC + HT group was significantly better than in the UC group (p = 0.03).
With respect to recruitment and different legal status, it does not seem feasible to perform a larger, international, pragmatic randomized trial on (semi-)individualized homeopathy for PMS/PMDD. Since the added value of HT compared with UC was demonstrated by significant differences in symptom score changes, further studies are warranted.
经前综合征和经前烦躁障碍(PMS/PMDD)困扰着大量女性。顺势疗法似乎是一种有前途的治疗方法,但需要使用可靠的研究设计进行调查。评估了一种国际随机实用试验的可行性,该试验比较了顺势疗法附加治疗(常规护理[UC]+HT)与单独 UC 的效果。
一项多中心、随机、对照的实用试验,采用平行组设计。
地点/设置:该研究在荷兰和瑞典的综合和私人顺势疗法诊所以及德国的一家门诊大学诊所组织进行。
根据前瞻性每日严重问题记录(DRSP)在两个月期间的日常评分,诊断为患有 PMS/PMDD 的女性被纳入并随机分组。
女性接受 UC+HT 或 UC 治疗 4 个月。顺势疗法药物的选择是根据先前经过测试的预测问卷和电子算法进行的。常规护理是根据女性的偏好由她们的全科医生提供的。
治疗前后,女性完成日记(DRSP)、自我关注和幸福感测量以及其他问卷。进行了意向治疗(ITT)和符合方案(PP)分析。
在德国,由于法律限制,该研究无法进行。在瑞典,招募工作非常困难。在荷兰和瑞典,共有 60 名女性被随机分组(UC+HT:28;UC:32),对 47/46 名女性的数据进行了分析(ITT/PP)。4 个月后,UC+HT 组的 DRSP 评分相对平均变化明显优于 UC 组(p=0.03)。
考虑到招募和不同的法律地位,似乎不可能针对(半)个体化顺势疗法治疗 PMS/PMDD 开展更大规模的国际实用随机试验。由于 HT 与 UC 相比在症状评分变化方面的显著差异,进一步的研究是必要的。