• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[来自德国医学协会和全国法定医疗保险医师协会重大事件报告系统的结构化病例分析]

[A structured case analysis from the Critical Incident Reporting System of the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians].

作者信息

Schrader Thomas, Tetzlaff Laura, Löwe Katharina, Schröder Cornelia, Beck Eberhard

机构信息

Technische Hochschule Brandenburg, Fachbereich Informatik und Medien, Brandenburg, Deutschland.

Technische Hochschule Brandenburg, Fachbereich Informatik und Medien, Brandenburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 May;133:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2018.02.009
PMID:29567385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reporting systems for near misses are necessary to improve patient safety. In Germany, different systems are publicly available on both a national and regional level or as systems related to various medical domains. In contrast with the British Registry, our reporting systems still lack systematic evaluation. Using the Open-Task-Process Model (OPT model) one case of CIRSmedical (www.cirsmedical.de) was selected for a systematic analysis.

METHOD

Case 148384 reports on a patient with a tentative diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with an oxygen saturation of 71 %. The attending physician was ordered to leave the patient to participate in the daily team meeting. After 40minutes, the nurses transferred the patient from the emergency department to the ICU. The OPT model systematically checks the properties of all tasks in a given process and matches them to requirements or solving capacities of the task.

RESULTS

The analysis manifests some structural problems: Although the case was not very difficult (high priority, but a frequent problem), the solving capacities were not adequate in order to avoid errors. Since the physician left the patient, the loyalty toward medical standards and the team error correction activity were low. The team did not intervene to prevent the doctor from leaving his patient.

CONCLUSION

The OPT model allows for the analysis of both single cases and complete data sets of CIR systems and is able to disclose structural problems of clinical management.

摘要

背景

为提高患者安全,需建立医疗差错未遂事件报告系统。在德国,国家和地区层面都有不同的公开可用系统,或者有与各个医学领域相关的系统。与英国注册系统不同,我们的报告系统仍缺乏系统评估。使用开放任务流程模型(OPT模型),从CIRSmedical(www.cirsmedical.de)中选取了一个案例进行系统分析。

方法

案例148384报告了一名初步诊断为肺栓塞且血氧饱和度为71%的患者。主治医生被要求离开患者去参加日常团队会议。40分钟后,护士将患者从急诊科转至重症监护病房。OPT模型系统地检查给定流程中所有任务的属性,并将其与任务的要求或解决能力进行匹配。

结果

分析表明存在一些结构问题:尽管该案例并非非常困难(优先级高,但属常见问题),但解决能力不足以避免错误。由于医生离开了患者,对医疗标准的忠诚度和团队纠错活动较低。团队未进行干预以阻止医生离开其患者。

结论

OPT模型可用于分析CIR系统的单个案例和完整数据集,并且能够揭示临床管理的结构问题。

相似文献

1
[A structured case analysis from the Critical Incident Reporting System of the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians].[来自德国医学协会和全国法定医疗保险医师协会重大事件报告系统的结构化病例分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 May;133:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
2
[Findings from 10 years of CIRS-AINS : An analysis of usepatterns and insights into new challenges].[10年CIRS-AINS的研究结果:使用模式分析及对新挑战的洞察]
Anaesthesist. 2020 Nov;69(11):793-802. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00829-z. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
[jeder-fehler-zaehlt.de: Content of and prospective benefits from a critical incident reporting and learning system (CIRS) for primary care].[每个错误都重要.de:基层医疗中不良事件报告与学习系统(CIRS)的内容及预期益处]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
4
[Specimen labelling: A complex process with a high error rate].[标本标记:一个错误率高的复杂过程]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Sep;135-136:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Reporting system for critical incidents in cross-sectoral healthcare (CIRS-CS): pre-test of a reporting sheet and optimization of a reporting system.跨部门医疗保健重大事件报告系统(CIRS-CS):报告表的预测试及报告系统的优化
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
6
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
7
[Patient safety in general practice].[全科医疗中的患者安全]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
9
[17 years of the critical incident reporting and learning system "jeder-fehler-zaehlt.de" for primary care: Analysis of reports].基层医疗中“jeder-fehler-zaehlt.de”关键事件报告与学习系统的17年:报告分析
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Apr;185:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
10
[Errors in medicine. Causes, impact and improvement measures to improve patient safety].[医学中的差错。提高患者安全的原因、影响及改进措施]
Anaesthesist. 2015 Sep;64(9):689-704. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0052-4.