• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发以患者为中心的干预措施,以提高二级护理中对抗生素治疗的知识和理解。

Development of a patient-centred intervention to improve knowledge and understanding of antibiotic therapy in secondary care.

机构信息

1National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK.

2Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS UK.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Mar 20;7:43. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0333-1. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-018-0333-1
PMID:29568516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859655/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed a personalised antimicrobial information module co-designed with patients. This study aimed to evaluate the potential impact of this patient-centred intervention on short-term knowledge and understanding of antimicrobial therapy in secondary care.

METHODS

Thirty previous patients who had received antibiotics in hospital within 12 months were recruited to co-design an intervention to promote patient engagement with infection management. Two workshops, containing five focus-groups were held. These were audio-recorded. Data were analysed using a thematic framework developed deductively based on previous work. Line-by-line coding was performed with new themes added to the framework by two researchers. This was used to inform the development of a patient information module, embedded within an electronic decision support tool (CDSS).The intervention was piloted over a four-week period at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust on 30 in-patients. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were developed and implemented to assess short term changes in patient knowledge and understanding and provide feedback on the intervention. Data were analysed using SPSS and NVIVO software.

RESULTS

Within the workshops, there was consistency in identified themes. The participants agreed upon and co-designed a personalised PDF document that could be integrated into an electronic CDSS to be used by healthcare professionals at the point-of-care. Their aim for the tool was to provide individualised practical information, signpost to reputable information sources, and enhance communication between patients and healthcare professionals.Eighteen out of thirty in-patients consented to participant in the pilot evaluation with 15/18(83%) completing the study. Median (range) age was 66(22-85) years. The majority were male (10/15;66%). Pre-intervention, patients reported desiring further information regarding their infections and antibiotic therapy, including side effects of treatment. Deployment of the intervention improved short term knowledge and understanding of individuals infections and antibiotic management with median (IQR) scores improving from 3(2-5)/13 to 10(6-11)/13. 13/15(87%) reported that they would use the intervention again.

CONCLUSION

A personalised, patient-centred intervention improved understanding and short-term knowledge of infections and antibiotic therapy in participating patients'. Long term impact on attitudes and behaviours post discharge will be further investigated.

摘要

背景

我们与患者合作开发了一个个性化的抗菌信息模块。本研究旨在评估这种以患者为中心的干预措施对短期了解和理解二级保健中抗菌治疗的潜在影响。

方法

在过去 12 个月内,我们招募了 30 名在医院接受过抗生素治疗的既往患者,共同设计了一项促进患者参与感染管理的干预措施。举办了两个包含五个焦点小组的研讨会。对这些研讨会进行了录音。根据先前的工作,使用一种从理论上推导出来的主题框架对数据进行了分析。通过两位研究人员向框架中添加新主题,对数据进行了逐行编码。这用于为嵌入电子决策支持工具(CDSS)中的患者信息模块的开发提供信息。在 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust 对 30 名住院患者进行了为期四周的干预试验。在干预之前和之后开发并实施了问卷调查,以评估患者知识和理解方面的短期变化,并提供对干预措施的反馈。使用 SPSS 和 NVIVO 软件分析数据。

结果

在研讨会中,主题一致。参与者一致同意并共同设计了一个个性化的 PDF 文档,可以集成到电子 CDSS 中,供医护人员在护理点使用。他们希望该工具能够提供个性化的实用信息,为可靠的信息来源提供指示,并增强患者与医护人员之间的沟通。在 30 名住院患者中,有 18 名同意参加试点评估,其中 15 名(83%)完成了研究。中位数(范围)年龄为 66(22-85)岁。大多数是男性(10/15;66%)。在干预前,患者报告说希望进一步了解他们的感染和抗生素治疗,包括治疗的副作用。该干预措施的部署提高了个人感染和抗生素管理的短期知识和理解,中位数(IQR)评分从 3(2-5)/13 提高到 10(6-11)/13。15 名(87%)患者表示他们会再次使用该干预措施。

结论

个性化、以患者为中心的干预措施提高了参与患者对感染和抗生素治疗的理解和短期知识。将进一步调查出院后对态度和行为的长期影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e5b/5859655/e1f3bb7b75f3/13756_2018_333_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e5b/5859655/cd3e3ceabf9c/13756_2018_333_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e5b/5859655/e1f3bb7b75f3/13756_2018_333_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e5b/5859655/cd3e3ceabf9c/13756_2018_333_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e5b/5859655/e1f3bb7b75f3/13756_2018_333_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a patient-centred intervention to improve knowledge and understanding of antibiotic therapy in secondary care.开发以患者为中心的干预措施,以提高二级护理中对抗生素治疗的知识和理解。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Mar 20;7:43. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0333-1. eCollection 2018.
2
Clinician acceptability of an antibiotic prescribing knowledge support system for primary care: a mixed-method evaluation of features and context.临床医生对初级保健抗生素处方知识支持系统的接受度:对功能和背景的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 14;23(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09239-4.
3
Interventions to facilitate shared decision making to address antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care.在初级保健中促进共同决策以解决急性呼吸道感染抗生素使用问题的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 12;2015(11):CD010907. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010907.pub2.
4
Direct oral penicillin challenge in secondary care with low-risk patients: the SPACE mixed-methods study with cost-effectiveness analysis.二级医疗中对低风险患者进行直接口服青霉素激发试验:SPACE混合方法研究及成本效益分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(9):1-96. doi: 10.3310/MTYW6557.
5
Shared decision making for patients with kidney failure to improve end-of-life care: Development of the DESIRE intervention.为肾衰竭患者进行共同决策以改善临终关怀:DESIRE 干预措施的制定。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(9):3498-3512. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17209. Epub 2024 May 8.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Electronically delivered interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in primary care: cluster RCT using electronic health records and cohort study.电子干预措施减少初级保健中呼吸道感染抗生素处方:使用电子健康记录的群组 RCT 和队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(11):1-70. doi: 10.3310/hta23110.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Results of a pilot cluster randomised trial of the use of a Medication Review Tool for people taking antipsychotic medication.一项针对服用抗精神病药物人群使用药物审查工具的试点整群随机试验结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 4;16:205. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0921-7.
10
Patient engagement with infection management in secondary care: a qualitative investigation of current experiences.二级医疗保健中患者对感染管理的参与度:对当前体验的定性调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 31;6(10):e011040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011040.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness of infection care terms among outpatients and carers in a public health facility: a cross-sectional survey.公共卫生机构门诊患者及护理人员对感染护理术语的认知:一项横断面调查
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Oct 9;8:574. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20162.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Uncovering doctors' perceived barriers and facilitators of antibiotic prescribing behaviours: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.揭示医生对抗生素处方行为的感知障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Dec 5;94(6):e2023265. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i6.15232.
3
Measurement and outcomes of co-production in health and social care: a systematic review of empirical studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Supervised learning for infection risk inference using pathology data.基于病理学数据的感染风险推理的有监督学习。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0550-1.
2
Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution.将脓毒症确认为全球卫生重点——一项世界卫生组织决议
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately?
卫生和社会保健中共同生产的测量和结果:实证研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 22;13(9):e073808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073808.
4
Behavioral Components and Context of Antimicrobial Prescription in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal.葡萄牙一家三级医院抗菌药物处方的行为成分与背景
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;12(6):1032. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061032.
5
Optimising antimicrobial use in humans - review of current evidence and an interdisciplinary consensus on key priorities for research.优化人类抗菌药物使用——当前证据综述及研究重点的跨学科共识
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun 29;7:100161. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100161. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Patient engagement with antibiotic messaging in secondary care: a qualitative feasibility study of the 'review and revise' experience.二级医疗保健中患者对抗生素信息的参与度:关于“回顾与修订”体验的定性可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Apr 4;6:43. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00590-5. eCollection 2020.
7
Pathway redesign: putting patients ahead of professionals.路径重塑:以患者为中心而非专业人士。
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Nov;19(6):468-472. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0292.
临床决策支持系统对抗菌药物管理的系统评价:我们是否未能恰当地研究这些干预措施?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Aug;23(8):524-532. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.028. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
Mapping the decision pathways of acute infection management in secondary care among UK medical physicians: a qualitative study.绘制英国内科医生在二级医疗中急性感染管理的决策路径:一项定性研究。
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 12;14(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0751-y.
5
Patient engagement with infection management in secondary care: a qualitative investigation of current experiences.二级医疗保健中患者对感染管理的参与度:对当前体验的定性调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 31;6(10):e011040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011040.
6
Patient and public understanding and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance and stewardship in a UK hospital: should public campaigns change focus?英国一家医院中患者及公众对抗菌素耐药性和管理的理解与认识:公众宣传活动是否应改变重点?
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):311-314. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw387. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
7
What are the factors driving antimicrobial resistance? Perspectives from a public event in London, England.推动抗菌素耐药性产生的因素有哪些?来自英国伦敦一场公共活动的观点。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 2;16(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1810-x.
8
Interventions to facilitate shared decision making to address antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care.在初级保健中促进共同决策以解决急性呼吸道感染抗生素使用问题的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 12;2015(11):CD010907. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010907.pub2.
9
The Critical Role of the Staff Nurse in Antimicrobial Stewardship--Unrecognized, but Already There.护士在抗菌药物管理中的关键作用——未被认识到,但已经存在。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 1;62(1):84-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ697. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
10
Antibiotic and shared decision-making preferences among adolescents in Malaysia.马来西亚青少年对抗生素的使用及共同决策偏好
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 May 13;9:665-73. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S82844. eCollection 2015.