Suppr超能文献

视频眼镜/耳机系统作为儿童牙科治疗中的分心方法:一项交叉随机对照临床试验。

A video eyeglasses/earphones system as distracting method during dental treatment in children: A crossover randomised and controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Pediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Dentistry, San Luis Potosi University, San Luis Potosí, SLP, México.

出版信息

Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;19(1):74-79. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.01.14.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of a Video Eyeglasses/Earphones System (VEES) as distracting device in reducing anxiety in children during dental procedures carried out under local anaesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this crossover clinical trial, 36 Frankl scale II and III children aged 5-8 years received different dental procedures in two sessions, with and without the VEES system. In the control visit, they were not exposed to this distraction stimulus, but traditional non-aversive behaviour management was applied. Each dental session was divided into four phases (explanation, anaesthetic injection, rubber-dam/clamp placement, and high-speed hand piece work for 5 min). Pain in each treatment phase was assessed by the following measurements: the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. Pulse rate, and oxygen saturation measurements were employed to evaluate the state of anxiety. Comparison of the outcomes of two interventions were statistically analysed through the Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between the results of the two interventions (VEES vs. no VEES/behavioural management) during the four treatment phases on assessment by any of the measurements employed.

CONCLUSIONS

The VEES method was not more effective than traditional non-aversive behavioural techniques for reducing anxiety and pain perception in children undergoing dental treatment.

摘要

目的

评估视频眼镜/耳机系统(VEES)作为分散注意力的装置在减轻局部麻醉下进行牙科手术儿童焦虑方面的有效性。

材料和方法

在这项交叉临床试验中,36 名 Frankl 量表 II 和 III 级的 5-8 岁儿童在两次就诊中接受了不同的牙科手术,一次使用 VEES 系统,一次不使用。在对照就诊中,他们没有接触到这种分散注意力的刺激,而是应用了传统的非痛苦行为管理。每次牙科治疗分为四个阶段(解释、麻醉注射、橡皮障/夹放置、高速手机工作 5 分钟)。每个治疗阶段的疼痛通过以下测量进行评估:面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰(FLACC)量表。脉搏率和血氧饱和度测量用于评估焦虑状态。通过 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对两种干预措施的结果进行统计学分析。

结果

在使用任何测量方法评估的四个治疗阶段中,两种干预措施(VEES 与无 VEES/行为管理)的结果之间没有统计学差异。

结论

与传统的非痛苦行为技术相比,VEES 方法在减轻接受牙科治疗的儿童的焦虑和疼痛感知方面并没有更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验