Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
J Neural Eng. 2018 Aug;15(4):046001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aab90f. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation can help individuals with neurological disorders to regain their motor function by activating muscles externally. However, conventional stimulation technique often induces near-simultaneous recruitment of muscle fibers, leading to twitch forces time-locked to the stimulation.
To induce less synchronized activation of finger flexor muscles, we delivered clustered narrower pulses to the proximal segment of the median and ulnar nerves at a carrier frequency of either 10 kHz (with an 80 µs pulse width) or 7.14 kHz (with a 120 µs pulse width) (high-frequency mode, HF), and different clustered pulses were delivered at a frequency of 30 or 40 Hz. Conventional stimulation with pulse frequency of 30 or 40 Hz (low-frequency mode, LF) was used for comparison. With matched elicited muscle forces between the HF and LF modes, the force variation, the high-density electromyogram (EMG) signals recorded at the finger flexor muscles and stimulation-induced-pain levels were compared.
The compound action potentials in the 10 kHz HF mode revealed a significant difference (i.e. a lower amplitude and area, and a wider duration) compared with the LF mode, indicating cancellations of asynchronized action potentials. A smaller fluctuation in the elicited forces in the 10 kHz mode further demonstrated the less synchronized activation of different motor units. These effects tended to be weaker in the 7.14 kHz HF condition. However, the levels of pain sensation was not reduced in the HF mode potentially due to the high charge density used in the HF mode. Our findings indicated that different nerve fibers were recruited asynchronously through summations of different numbers of subthreshold depolarizations in the HF mode.
Compared with the LF mode, the HF mode stimulation was capable of activating the nerve fibers in a less synchronized way, which is more similar to the physiological activation pattern.
经皮神经电刺激通过外部激活肌肉帮助神经障碍患者恢复运动功能。然而,传统的刺激技术通常会导致肌肉纤维近乎同时募集,从而导致肌肉抽搐力与刺激同步。
为了诱导手指屈肌较少的同步激活,我们在载波频率为 10 kHz(脉冲宽度为 80 μs)或 7.14 kHz(脉冲宽度为 120 μs)(高频模式,HF)的情况下,在正中神经和尺神经的近端段传递更窄的簇状脉冲,并且以 30 或 40 Hz 的频率传递不同的簇状脉冲。使用脉冲频率为 30 或 40 Hz 的常规刺激(低频模式,LF)进行比较。在 HF 和 LF 模式之间匹配诱发的肌肉力的情况下,比较了力变化、在手指屈肌上记录的高密度肌电图(EMG)信号和刺激诱导的疼痛水平。
与 LF 模式相比,10 kHz HF 模式的复合动作电位显示出显著差异(即幅度和面积较低,持续时间较宽),表明去同步动作电位的消除。在 10 kHz 模式下,诱发力的波动较小进一步证明了不同运动单位的激活不同步。这些效应在 7.14 kHz HF 条件下较弱。然而,由于 HF 模式中使用的高电荷量,HF 模式中的疼痛感觉水平没有降低。我们的发现表明,通过不同数量的亚阈去极化的总和,HF 模式中的不同神经纤维以不同步的方式被募集。
与 LF 模式相比,HF 模式刺激能够以不同步的方式激活神经纤维,这更类似于生理激活模式。