Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018 Jun;88(6):950-956. doi: 10.1111/cen.13597. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
To assess the changes resulting from the changes from UICC/AJCC TNM version 7 to version 8 and to subsequently determine whether TNM version 8 is an improvement compared to previous iterations of the TNM system and other staging systems for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with regard to prognostic power.
Database study of DTC patients treated in our centre between 1978 up to and including 1 July 2014. Results were compared to our previous comparison of prognostic systems using the same data set.
2257 DTC patients.
Staging in accordance with TNM 7 and TNM 8. Thyroid cancer-specific mortality; comparison was based on p-values of univariate Cox regression analyses as well as analysis of the proportion of variance explained (PVE).
There is a redistribution from stage 3 to lower stages affecting 206 (9.1%) patients. DTC-related mortality according to Kaplan-Meier for younger and older patients in TNM 7 had a slightly lower prognostic power than that in accordance with TNM 8 (P = 8.0 10 and P = 1.5 10 , respectively). Overall staging is lower in 627/2257 (27.8%) patients. PVE (TNM 7: 0.29; TNM 8: 0.28) and the P-value of Cox regressions (TNM 7: P = 7.110 ; TNM 8: P = 3.910 ) for TNM version 8 are marginally lower than that for TNM version 7, but still better than for any other DTC staging system.
TNM 8 results in a marked downstaging of patients compared to TNM 7. Although some changes, like the change in age boundary, appear to be associated with an improvement in prognostic power, the overall effect of the changes does not improve the predictive power compared to TNM 7.
评估 UICC/AJCC TNM 第 7 版到第 8 版的变化,并随后确定 TNM 第 8 版与之前的 TNM 系统迭代以及其他分化型甲状腺癌 (DTC) 分期系统相比,在预后能力方面是否有所改进。
对我们中心 1978 年至 2014 年 7 月 1 日期间治疗的 DTC 患者进行数据库研究。结果与我们之前使用相同数据集比较预后系统的研究进行比较。
2257 例 DTC 患者。
根据 TNM 第 7 版和第 8 版进行分期。甲状腺癌特异性死亡率;比较基于单因素 Cox 回归分析的 p 值以及方差解释比例 (PVE)。
有 206 例(9.1%)患者从第 3 期重新分配到较低的分期。TNM 第 7 版和第 8 版中年轻和老年患者的 DTC 相关死亡率的预后能力略低于第 8 版(P=8.0×10 和 P=1.5×10,分别)。在 2257 例患者中,627 例(27.8%)的总体分期较低。PVE(TNM 第 7 版:0.29;TNM 第 8 版:0.28)和 Cox 回归的 P 值(TNM 第 7 版:P=7.1×10;TNM 第 8 版:P=3.9×10)对于 TNM 第 8 版略低于 TNM 第 7 版,但仍优于任何其他 DTC 分期系统。
与 TNM 第 7 版相比,TNM 第 8 版导致患者明显降级。尽管一些变化,如年龄界限的变化,似乎与预后能力的提高有关,但与 TNM 第 7 版相比,这些变化的总体效果并未提高预测能力。