Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Clin Anesth. 2018 Jun;47:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Possible advantages and risks associated with ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation in-comparison to digital palpation guided method in adult patients are not fully known. We have compared ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation with digital palpation technique in this meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Trials conducted in operating room, emergency department, cardiac catheterization laboratory.
PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched (from 1946 to 20th November 2017) to identify prospective randomized controlled trials in adult patients.
Two-dimensional ultrasound guided radial artery catheterization versus digital palpation guided radial artery cannulation.
Overall cannulation success rate, first attempt success rate, time to cannulation and mean number of attempts to successful cannulation. Odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for categorical and continuous variables respectively.
Data of 1895 patients from 10 studies have been included in this meta- analysis. Overall cannulation success rate was similar between ultrasound guided technique and digital palpation [OR (95% CI) 2.01 (1.00, 4.06); p = 0.05]. Ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation is associated with higher first attempt success rate of radial artery cannulation in comparison to digital palpation [OR (95% CI) 2.76 (186, 4.10); p < 0.001]. No difference was seen in time to cannulate [SMD (95% CI) -0.31 (-0.65, 0.04); p = 0.30] and mean number of attempt [MD (95% CI) -0.65 (-1.32, 0.02); p = 0.06] between USG guided technique with palpation technique.
Radial artery cannulation by ultrasound guidance may increase the first attempt success rate but not the overall cannulation success when compared to digital palpation technique. However, results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due presence of heterogeneity.
在成人患者中,超声引导桡动脉置管与数字触诊引导方法相比可能具有优势和风险,目前尚不完全清楚。本研究通过荟萃分析比较了超声引导桡动脉置管与数字触诊技术。
随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
在手术室、急诊室和心导管实验室进行的试验。
检索 PubMed 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(从 1946 年至 2017 年 11 月 20 日),以确定成人患者的前瞻性随机对照试验。
二维超声引导桡动脉置管与数字触诊引导桡动脉置管。
总置管成功率、首次尝试成功率、置管时间和成功置管的平均尝试次数。计算了分类变量和连续变量的比值比(OR)和标准化均数差(SMD)或均数差(MD)及 95%置信区间(CI)。
本荟萃分析纳入了 10 项研究的 1895 例患者的数据。超声引导技术与数字触诊技术的总置管成功率相似[OR(95%CI)2.01(1.00,4.06);p=0.05]。与数字触诊相比,超声引导桡动脉置管首次尝试成功率更高[OR(95%CI)2.76(186,4.10);p<0.001]。置管时间无差异[SMD(95%CI)-0.31(-0.65,0.04);p=0.30],平均尝试次数也无差异[MD(95%CI)-0.65(-1.32,0.02);p=0.06]。
与数字触诊技术相比,超声引导桡动脉置管可能会增加首次尝试成功率,但不会增加总体置管成功率。然而,由于存在异质性,应谨慎解释本荟萃分析的结果。