Cuker Adam
Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Am J Hematol. 2018 Jun;93(6):816-823. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25092. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
In patients with immune thrombocytopenia who do not adequately respond to first-line therapy, there is no clear consensus on which second-line therapy to initiate and when. This situation leads to suboptimal approaches, including prolonged exposure to treatments that are not intended for long-term use (eg, corticosteroids) and overuse of off-label therapies (eg, rituximab) while approved, more efficacious options exist. These approaches may not only fail to address symptoms and burden of disease, but may also worsen health-related quality of life. A better understanding of available second-line treatments may ensure best use of therapeutic options and thereby optimize patient outcomes.
在对一线治疗反应不佳的免疫性血小板减少症患者中,对于启动哪种二线治疗以及何时启动,尚无明确的共识。这种情况导致了次优的治疗方法,包括长期使用并非用于长期治疗的药物(如皮质类固醇),以及在有已获批、更有效的选择时过度使用标签外疗法(如利妥昔单抗)。这些治疗方法不仅可能无法缓解症状和减轻疾病负担,还可能使健康相关生活质量恶化。更好地了解可用的二线治疗方法,可能确保最佳地使用治疗选择,从而优化患者的治疗结果。