• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脾切除术率和 ITP 的主要结局在新治疗方法引入后是否发生了变化?35 年来门诊环境中的单中心研究。

Have splenectomy rate and main outcomes of ITP changed after the introduction of new treatments? A monocentric study in the outpatient setting during 35 years.

机构信息

Institute of Hematology "L. E A. Seràgnoli," Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2016 Jun;91(4):E267-72. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24310.

DOI:10.1002/ajh.24310
PMID:26799593
Abstract

In the last years, rituximab (RTX) and agonists of the thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) eltrombopag and romiplostim have provided new treatment options in persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Here, we analyzed the changes in therapeutic choices over time and their impact on clinical outcomes in a cohort of 557 ITP outpatients followed at the "L. and A. Seràgnoli" Institute of Hematology, Bologna, Italy, from 1980 to 2015. Overall 397 patients (71%) required front-line corticosteroids, mainly prednisone. Over the decades, splenectomy was delayed from second to third-line, but was steadily used in around 15-25% of patients refractory or relapsing after first-line treatment. Consensually, RTX and TPO-R agonists emerged as second and third-line therapy of choice, respectively. Splenectomy was associated with the best response rates and the lower incidences of relapse, while the relapse rate after RTX was comparable to that observed with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents. The introduction of TPO-R agonists gave an alternative to the administration of immunosuppressive drugs and probably contributed to moderate the incidence of infectious complications that remained stable over the decades, despite an increasing use of RTX from the 2000s onwards. Overall responses were similar over time, with over 97% achieving a response in all time-periods. However, the cumulative risk of bleeding significantly decreased [14.3% (1980-89) vs. 7% (1990-99) vs. 5.6% (2000-09) vs. 0.2% (2010-15)] (P < 0.001), mainly thanks to the optimization of front-line corticosteroids therapy and to the wider availability of second and third-line therapies.

摘要

在过去的几年中,利妥昔单抗(RTX)和血小板生成素受体(TPO-R)激动剂艾曲波帕和罗米司亭为持续性和慢性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)提供了新的治疗选择。在这里,我们分析了意大利博洛尼亚“L. 和 A. Seràgnoli”血液学研究所从 1980 年到 2015 年随访的 557 例 ITP 门诊患者随时间推移治疗选择的变化及其对临床结局的影响。总体而言,397 例患者(71%)需要一线皮质类固醇,主要是泼尼松。几十年来,脾切除术从二线推迟到三线,但在一线治疗后抵抗或复发的约 15-25%的患者中稳定使用。一致地,RTX 和 TPO-R 激动剂分别作为二线和三线治疗选择。脾切除术与最佳反应率和较低的复发率相关,而 RTX 后的复发率与皮质类固醇和其他免疫抑制剂相似。TPO-R 激动剂的引入为免疫抑制药物的治疗提供了替代方案,并且可能有助于减轻感染并发症的发生率,尽管从 21 世纪初开始 RTX 的使用不断增加,但几十年来感染并发症的发生率仍保持稳定。总体反应随时间相似,所有时间段的反应率均超过 97%。然而,出血的累积风险显著降低[14.3%(1980-89 年)比 7%(1990-99 年)比 5.6%(2000-09 年)比 0.2%(2010-15 年)](P < 0.001),主要得益于一线皮质类固醇治疗的优化和二线和三线治疗的更广泛应用。

相似文献

1
Have splenectomy rate and main outcomes of ITP changed after the introduction of new treatments? A monocentric study in the outpatient setting during 35 years.脾切除术率和 ITP 的主要结局在新治疗方法引入后是否发生了变化?35 年来门诊环境中的单中心研究。
Am J Hematol. 2016 Jun;91(4):E267-72. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24310.
2
The choice of second-line therapy in steroid-resistant immune thrombocytopenia: role of platelet kinetics in a single-centre long-term study.二线治疗在激素抵抗性免疫性血小板减少症中的选择:单中心长期研究中血小板动力学的作用。
Am J Hematol. 2014 Nov;89(11):1047-50. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23823. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
[Treatment outcome of immune thrombocytopenia].[免疫性血小板减少症的治疗结果]
Orv Hetil. 2012 Oct 14;153(41):1613-21. doi: 10.1556/OH.2012.29456.
4
ITP and international guidelines: what do we know, what do we need?免疫性血小板减少症与国际指南:我们了解什么,我们需要什么?
Presse Med. 2014 Apr;43(4 Pt 2):e61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
5
Twenty years experience with treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in a single department: results in 490 cases.单一科室二十年特发性血小板减少性紫癜治疗经验:490例治疗结果
Haematologica. 1993 Nov-Dec;78(6 Suppl 2):22-8.
6
Reemergence of Splenectomy for ITP Second-line Treatment?脾切除术治疗 ITP 的二线治疗方案是否会重新出现?
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):772-777. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001912.
7
Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in immune thrombocytopenic purpura: long-term results of 402 cases.脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的疗效与安全性:402例长期结果
Haematologica. 2005 Jan;90(1):72-7.
8
Outpatient Management of Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) by Hematologists 1995-2014.血液科医生对免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)患者的门诊管理,1995 - 2014年
Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(1-2):41-4. doi: 10.1159/000442769. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
9
[Diagnostic approach and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in adults].[成人免疫性血小板减少症的诊断方法与治疗]
Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Mar;67(1):3-11.
10
[Epidemiology and pharmacoepidemiology of immune thrombocytopenia].[免疫性血小板减少症的流行病学与药物流行病学]
Rev Med Interne. 2017 Jul;38(7):444-449. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2016.12.016. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Splenectomy Response in Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Multicentric Italian Study.免疫性血小板减少症脾切除术反应的预测因素:一项意大利多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):30. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010030.
2
Elective splenectomy for hematological diseases: a vanishing indication.择期脾切除术治疗血液系统疾病:一个逐渐消失的适应证。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6332-6337. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11071-8. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Contextualization from a Historical Perspective.免疫性血小板减少症的治疗:历史视角下的情境化
Hematol Rep. 2024 Jun 26;16(3):390-412. doi: 10.3390/hematolrep16030039.
4
Rituximab versus Splenectomy in Chronic Primary ITP: Experience of a Single Hematology Clinic.利妥昔单抗与脾切除术治疗慢性原发性免疫性血小板减少症:单家血液科诊所的经验
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 1;16(1):e2024019. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.019. eCollection 2024.
5
Splenectomy outcomes in immune cytopenias: Treatment outcomes and determinants of response.脾切除术治疗免疫性血细胞减少症的结局:治疗结局和反应的决定因素。
J Intern Med. 2024 Feb;295(2):229-241. doi: 10.1111/joim.13742. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
6
Budget impact analysis for avatrombopag in the treatment of chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia in adult patients refractory to other treatments.阿伐曲泊帕治疗对其他治疗难治的成年慢性原发性免疫性血小板减少症的预算影响分析。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Jun 30;11(1):2230663. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2230663. eCollection 2023.
7
Long-term efficacy and safety profile of splenectomy for pediatric chronic immune thrombocytopenia.儿童慢性免疫性血小板减少症脾切除术的长期疗效和安全性。
Int J Hematol. 2023 May;117(5):774-780. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03529-z. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
8
Survival in adult patients with chronic primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia: A population-based study.成人慢性原发和继发免疫性血小板减少症患者的生存情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Transfusion. 2023 Feb;63(2):415-426. doi: 10.1111/trf.17212. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
Treatment of congenital thrombocytopenia and decreased collagen reactivity in G6b-B-deficient mice.治疗 G6b-B 缺乏型小鼠的先天性血小板减少症和胶原反应性降低。
Blood Adv. 2023 Jan 10;7(1):46-59. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008873.
10
Very severe immune thrombocytopenia following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination requiring splenectomy: a case report.接种新型冠状病毒2疫苗后发生极重度免疫性血小板减少症并需行脾切除术:一例报告
Thromb J. 2022 Aug 23;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12959-022-00404-z.