O'Sullivan B P, Johnson P F, Blosser R L, Rupp N W, Li S H
J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Aug;58(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90171-5.
This study evaluated the tensile bond strength of Conclude luting composite to dentin under different environmental conditions with Scotchbond dental adhesive, the FNP system, and unfilled BIS-GMA resin used as bonding agents. Although the bonding systems reportedly yield high tensile bond values to enamel, large differences were observed in this study for bond values to dentin. Only the FNP bonding system produced consistently high tensile load values to dentin under the three environmental conditions tested.
本研究评估了在不同环境条件下，使用Scotchbond牙科粘合剂、FNP系统以及未填充的双酚A缩水甘油醚（BIS-GMA）树脂作为粘结剂时，Conclude粘结性复合材料与牙本质之间的拉伸粘结强度。尽管据报道这些粘结系统对牙釉质具有较高的拉伸粘结值，但在本研究中观察到它们与牙本质的粘结值存在很大差异。在测试的三种环境条件下，只有FNP粘结系统对牙本质始终产生较高的拉伸负荷值。
