• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

容积性肾图代表肾功能,并在预测腔内修复主动脉瘤(EVAR)结局时补充主动脉解剖严重程度分级。

Volumetric Nephrogram Represents Renal Function and Complements Aortic Anatomic Severity Grade in Predicting EVAR Outcomes.

作者信息

Balceniuk Mark D, Trakimas Lauren, Aghaie Claudia, Mix Doran, Rasheed Khurram, Seaman Matthew, Ellis Jennifer, Glocker Roan, Doyle Adam, Stoner Michael C

机构信息

1 Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 Jul;52(5):344-348. doi: 10.1177/1538574418765601. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1177/1538574418765601
PMID:29576004
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a predictor of poor outcomes for patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Anatomic severity grade (ASG) represents a quantitative mechanism for assessing anatomical suitability for endovascular aortic repair. Anatomic severity grade has been correlated with repair outcomes and resource utilization. The purpose of this study was to identify a novel renal perfusion metric as a way to assist ASG with predicting EVAR outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair cases. Anatomic grading was undertaken by independent reviewers. Using volumetric software, kidney volume, and a novel measure of kidney functional volume, the volumetric nephrogram (VN) was recorded. Systematic evaluation of the relationship of kidney volume and VN to CKD and ASG was undertaken using linear regression and receiver-operator statistical tools.

RESULTS

A total of 386 cases with patient and anatomic data were identified and graded. Mean age was 72.9 ± 0.4 years. Renal volume <281 mL correlated with CKD (area under the curve [AUC] = .708; P ≤ .0001). Volumetric nephrogram <22.5 HU·L correlated with CKD (AUC = 0.764; P ≤ .0001). High (≥15) ASG scores correlated with both renal volume (AUC = .628; P ≤ .0001) and VN (AUC = .628; P ≤ .0001). Regression analysis demonstrated a strong, inverse relationship between ASG and VN ( R = .95).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that VN is a strong predictor of CKD in a large database of patients undergoing elective aneurysm repair. We demonstrate an inverse relationship between renal function and ASG that has not been previously described in the literature. Additionally, we have shown that VN complements ASG as a model of overall cardiovascular health and atherosclerotic burden. Outcomes in patients with poor renal function may be related to anatomical issues in addition to well-described systemic ramifications.

摘要

引言

慢性肾脏病(CKD)是接受血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)患者预后不良的一个预测指标。解剖严重程度分级(ASG)是评估血管腔内主动脉修复术解剖学适宜性的一种定量方法。解剖严重程度分级与修复结果及资源利用相关。本研究的目的是确定一种新的肾灌注指标,作为辅助ASG预测EVAR结果的一种方法。

方法

对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,确定择期肾下腹主动脉瘤修复病例。由独立评审员进行解剖分级。使用容积软件记录肾脏体积以及一种新的肾脏功能体积测量指标——容积肾图(VN)。使用线性回归和受试者操作统计工具对肾脏体积和VN与CKD及ASG之间的关系进行系统评估。

结果

共确定并分级了386例有患者和解剖数据的病例。平均年龄为72.9±0.4岁。肾脏体积<281 mL与CKD相关(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.708;P≤0.0001)。容积肾图<22.5 HU·L与CKD相关(AUC=0.764;P≤0.0001)。高(≥15)ASG评分与肾脏体积(AUC=0.628;P≤0.0001)和VN(AUC=0.628;P≤0.0001)均相关。回归分析显示ASG与VN之间存在强烈的负相关关系(R=0.9)。

结论

这些数据表明,在接受择期动脉瘤修复的大量患者数据库中,VN是CKD的一个强有力的预测指标。我们证明了肾功能与ASG之间存在一种此前文献中未描述的负相关关系。此外,我们还表明VN作为整体心血管健康和动脉粥样硬化负担的一种模型,对ASG起到补充作用。肾功能不佳患者的预后可能除了与已充分描述的全身影响外,还与解剖学问题有关。

相似文献

1
Volumetric Nephrogram Represents Renal Function and Complements Aortic Anatomic Severity Grade in Predicting EVAR Outcomes.容积性肾图代表肾功能,并在预测腔内修复主动脉瘤(EVAR)结局时补充主动脉解剖严重程度分级。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 Jul;52(5):344-348. doi: 10.1177/1538574418765601. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
2
A case-matched validation study of anatomic severity grade score in predicting reinterventions after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.解剖严重程度分级评分预测血管内主动脉瘤修复后再次干预的病例匹配验证研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):582-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.045. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Aortic anatomic severity grade correlates with resource utilization.主动脉解剖严重程度分级与资源利用相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Mar;63(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.043. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
Anatomic severity grading score predicts technical difficulty, early outcomes, and hospital resource utilization of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.解剖严重程度分级评分可预测血管内主动脉瘤修复的技术难度、早期结果和医院资源利用情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
5
Aortic Anatomic Severity Grade Correlates with Midterm Mortality in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.主动脉解剖严重程度分级与接受腹主动脉瘤修复患者的中期死亡率相关。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 May;53(4):292-296. doi: 10.1177/1538574419828083. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
Renal Function is the Main Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.肾功能是血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后急性肾损伤的主要预测指标。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;31:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Safety and accuracy of endovascular aneurysm repair without pre-operative and intra-operative contrast agent.血管内动脉瘤修复术无需术前和术中对比剂的安全性和准确性。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Outcome-based anatomic criteria for defining the hostile aortic neck.基于结果的用于定义主动脉颈部不良的解剖学标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1383-90.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.063. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
9
Comparison of the effects of open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair on long-term renal function using chronic kidney disease staging based on glomerular filtration rate.基于肾小球滤过率的慢性肾脏病分期比较开放手术与血管腔内修复术治疗腹主动脉瘤对长期肾功能的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1141-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.039.
10
The Impact of Aneurysm Morphology and Anatomic Characteristics on Long-Term Survival after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.动脉瘤形态和解剖特征对血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后长期生存的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;34:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.12.022. Epub 2016 May 10.