Dept. of Water Resources, Graduate School of Water Resources, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 15;633:470-483. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.138. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
Assessment of Land Surface Models (LSMs) at heterogeneous terrain and climate regimes is essential for understanding complex hydrological and biophysical parameterization. This study utilized the two LSMs, Community Land Model (CLM 4.0) and three layer Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC-3L), to estimate the interaction between land surface and atmosphere by means of energy fluxes including net radiation (R), sensible heat flux (H), latent heat flux (LE), and ground heat flux (G). The modeled energy fluxes were analyzed at two sites: Freeman Ranch-2 (FR2) located in the lowland region of Texas (272m), and Providence 301 (P301) located on the mountains of Sierra Nevada in California (2015m) from 2003 to 2013. R was underestimated by CLM with bias -25.06Wm due to its snow hydrology scheme at P301. LE was overestimated by the VIC during summer precipitation and had a positive bias of 5.51Wm, whereas CLM showed a negative bias of -6.58Wm at the FR2 site. G was considered as a residual term in CLM, which caused weak performance at P301, while VIC calculated G as a function of soil temperature, depth, and hydraulic conductivity. In addition, The MOD16 showed similar results with models at FR2; however, at P301, they yielded a correlation value of 0.85 and 0.21 for LSMs and MOD16, respectively. The later has lower correlation with in situ specifically in summer season caused by erroneous biophysical or meteorological inputs to the algorithms. The sensitivity analysis between soil moisture and turbulent fluxes, exhibited negative trend (especially for LE at P301) due to topography and snow cover. The results from this study are conducive to improvements in models and satellite based characterization of water and energy fluxes, especially at rugged terrain with high elevation, where observational experiments are difficult to conduct.
评估陆地表面模型(LSMs)在非均匀地形和气候条件下的表现对于理解复杂的水文和生物物理参数化至关重要。本研究利用两种陆地表面模型,即通用陆面模式(CLM 4.0)和三层可变入渗容量(VIC-3L),通过净辐射(R)、感热通量(H)、潜热通量(LE)和土壤热通量(G)等能量通量来估计陆地表面与大气之间的相互作用。在所分析的两个地点(德克萨斯州低地的弗里曼牧场-2(FR2)和加利福尼亚内华达山脉的普罗维登斯 301(P301)),对 2003 年至 2013 年期间的模型化能量通量进行了分析。由于 P301 的积雪水文方案,CLM 低估了 R,偏差为-25.06Wm。VIC 在夏季降水期间高估了 LE,正偏差为 5.51Wm,而 CLM 在 FR2 站点表现出-6.58Wm 的负偏差。G 被视为 CLM 中的残差项,这导致其在 P301 的表现不佳,而 VIC 将 G 计算为土壤温度、深度和水力传导率的函数。此外,MOD16 在 FR2 站点与模型的结果相似,但在 P301 站点,它们的相关系数分别为 0.85 和 0.21。MOD16 与 LSM 相比,在夏季由于向算法输入错误的生物物理或气象数据,导致其与现场观测的相关性较低。土壤湿度与湍流通量之间的敏感性分析显示出负趋势(特别是在 P301 站点的 LE),这是由于地形和积雪覆盖的影响。本研究的结果有助于改进模型和基于卫星的水和能量通量特征化,特别是在地形崎岖、海拔较高的地区,这些地区的观测实验难以进行。