Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Department of Physics, Section of Environmental Physics-Meteorology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 15;633:492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.159. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
Air Quality indicators or indices (AQIs) are mainly used for communicating the air pollution levels and risk to the general population. However, very few epidemiological studies have used AQIs for characterizing exposure.
In the framework of the RESPOZE panel study we evaluated the association of daily ozone AQI levels with the daily occurrence of respiratory symptoms and Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) and compared the effects with those estimated using measurements from fixed outdoor monitoring sites, in the city of Athens, Greece.
A panel of 97 children, aged 10-11years, was followed intensively for 35days (5weeks) during the academic year 2013-14. PEF and symptoms were recorded daily by each child. Two ozone AQIs classifying the air quality into 7 categories of increasing severity, were calculated; one characterizing the whole Athens area and one the local area around the child's residence and school. Measurements from fixed sites were also used. Mixed effects models for repeated measurements were applied, adjusting for several confounders.
Increasing ozone levels were associated with increased incidence of symptoms, but the strongest and most statistically significant associations were found with the local air quality characterization with the AQI. Specifically, an increase in AQI-local by one category was associated with 34% (95% CI: 9%, 64%) increased odds of stuffy nose. When the AQI categories were "Bad" and "Severe", an increase in the incidence of cough was observed (OR 3.05 (95% CI: 1.29, 7.22) and 6.42 (95% CI: 1.47, 28.03) respectively). We did not observe a statistically significant association between AQI and PEF.
Our results show that the use of an AQI based on local conditions may be advantageous over the use of only measurements when investigating the effects of air pollution on health outcomes for improving communication of risk to the public.
空气质量指标或指数(AQI)主要用于向公众传达空气污染水平和风险。然而,很少有流行病学研究使用 AQI 来描述暴露情况。
在 RESPOZE 面板研究中,我们评估了每日臭氧 AQI 水平与呼吸症状和呼气峰值流量(PEF)每日发生的关系,并将其与使用希腊雅典市固定户外监测点测量值估计的结果进行了比较。
一个由 97 名 10-11 岁儿童组成的小组在 2013-14 学年期间进行了为期 35 天(5 周)的密集随访。每个孩子每天记录 PEF 和症状。计算了两个将空气质量分为 7 个严重程度类别的臭氧 AQI;一个描述整个雅典地区,另一个描述孩子居住地和学校周围的局部地区。还使用了固定站点的测量值。应用了重复测量的混合效应模型,调整了几个混杂因素。
臭氧水平升高与症状发生率增加有关,但与 AQI 描述的局部空气质量的关联最强且最具统计学意义。具体而言,AQI-局部增加一个类别与鼻塞的几率增加 34%(95%CI:9%,64%)相关。当 AQI 类别为“差”和“严重”时,咳嗽的发生率增加(OR 分别为 3.05(95%CI:1.29,7.22)和 6.42(95%CI:1.47,28.03))。我们没有观察到 AQI 与 PEF 之间存在统计学显著关联。
我们的结果表明,在调查空气污染对健康结果的影响时,使用基于局部条件的 AQI 可能比仅使用测量值更有利,以便向公众传达风险。