Suppr超能文献

血肿阻滞或程序性镇静镇痛,哪种是复位桡骨远端移位骨折时最有效的麻醉方法?

Hematoma block or procedural sedation and analgesia, which is the most effective method of anesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fracture?

作者信息

Tseng Ping-Tao, Leu Tsai-Hsueh, Chen Yen-Wen, Chen Yu-Pin

机构信息

WinShine Clinics in Specialty of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Number 111, Section 3, Xinglong Road, Wenshan District, Taipei City, 116, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0772-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Procedure sedation and analgesia (PSA) is often used to alleviate discomfort and to facilitate fracture reduction for patients with distal radius fracture in emergency departments and clinics, but risks of respiratory distress and needs for different levels of monitoring under PSA are still under concern. Hematoma block (HB) is a simple alternative method of providing rapid pain relief during reduction of distal radius fracture. However, there is still in lack of strong evidence to promote HB over PSA in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare HB and PSA for adult and pediatric patients during reduction of displaced distal radius fracture to identify the level of pain relief, frequency of adverse effects (AEs), and reduction failure.

METHODS

The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies comparing HB or PSA in distal radius fracture reduction. The search revealed four randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized trial, which included two studies of pediatric subjects and three studies of adult subjects. Subgroup meta-analysis for adult and pediatric groups were specifically performed according to age difference to avoid potential bias.

RESULTS

In the adult group, the effect of HB on post-reduction pain severity was better than that of PSA with significant heterogeneity (Hedges' g - 0.600, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.170 to - 0.029, p = 0.039), although there was no difference on the pain severity during reduction between these two groups with significant heterogeneity (Hedges' g 0.356, 95% CI - 1.101 to 1.812, p = 0.632). In the pediatric group, the treatment effect on pain severity was significantly better by HB than that by PSA but without significant heterogeneity (Hedges' g - 0.402, 95% CI - 0.718 to - 0.085, p = 0.013, I  < 0.001%). Most of the reported adverse effects (AEs) include nausea, vomiting, and respiratory distress developed in adult patients treated by PSA. The rates of reported AEs did not significantly differ between HB and PSA in the pediatric group. Additionally, final outcomes of reduction failure did not significantly differ between HB and PSA in both adult and pediatric groups.

CONCLUSION

Hematoma block is a safe and effective alternative of anesthesia in reduction of distal radius fracture without inferior pain relief compared with PSA among adult and pediatric patients.

摘要

背景

在急诊科和诊所中,手术镇静镇痛(PSA)常用于缓解桡骨远端骨折患者的不适并便于骨折复位,但PSA下呼吸窘迫风险及不同监测水平需求仍备受关注。血肿阻滞(HB)是在桡骨远端骨折复位期间提供快速疼痛缓解的一种简单替代方法。然而,在临床实践中,仍缺乏有力证据支持HB优于PSA。本研究旨在比较成人和儿童患者在移位桡骨远端骨折复位期间HB和PSA的疼痛缓解程度、不良反应(AE)发生率及复位失败情况。

方法

检索PubMed、ScienceDirect、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov,查找比较HB或PSA用于桡骨远端骨折复位的研究。检索发现四项随机对照试验和一项非随机试验,其中包括两项儿科研究和三项成人研究。根据年龄差异对成人和儿科组进行亚组Meta分析,以避免潜在偏倚。

结果

在成人组中,HB对复位后疼痛严重程度的影响优于PSA,存在显著异质性(Hedges' g -0.600,95%置信区间(CI)-1.170至-0.029,p = 0.039),尽管两组复位期间疼痛严重程度无差异,存在显著异质性(Hedges' g 0.356,95% CI -1.101至1.812,p = 0.632)。在儿科组中,HB对疼痛严重程度的治疗效果显著优于PSA,但无显著异质性(Hedges' g -0.402,95% CI -0.718至-0.085,p = 0.013,I² < 0.001%)。报告的大多数不良反应包括接受PSA治疗的成年患者出现的恶心、呕吐和呼吸窘迫。儿科组中HB和PSA报告的AE发生率无显著差异。此外,成人和儿科组中HB和PSA复位失败的最终结果无显著差异。

结论

血肿阻滞是桡骨远端骨折复位中一种安全有效的麻醉替代方法,与PSA相比,在成人和儿童患者中疼痛缓解效果不逊色。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cb8/5869786/73270a2fbd3d/13018_2018_772_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验