Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug;99(8):1547-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
To introduce the Windmill-task, a new objective assessment tool to quantify the presence of mirror movements (MMs) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), which are typically assessed with the observation-based Woods and Teuber scale (W&T).
Prospective, observational, cohort pilot study.
Children's hospital.
Prospective cohort of children (N=23) with UCP (age range, 6-15y, mean age, 10.5±2.7y).
Not applicable.
The concurrent validity of the Windmill-task is assessed, and the sensitivity and specificity for MM detection are compared between both assessments. To assess the concurrent validity, Windmill-task data are compared with W&T data using Spearman rank correlations (ρ) for 2 conditions: affected hand moving vs less affected hand moving. Sensitivity and specificity are compared by measuring the mean percentage of children being assessed inconsistently across both assessments.
Outcomes of both assessments correlated significantly (affected hand moving: ρ=.520; P=.005; less affected hand moving: ρ=.488; P=.009). However, many children displayed MMs on the Windmill-task, but not on the W&T (sensitivity: affected hand moving: 27.5%; less affected hand moving: 40.6%). Only 2 children displayed MMs on the W&T, but not on the Windmill-task (specificity: affected hand moving: 2.9%; less affected hand moving: 1.4%).
The Windmill-task seems to be a valid tool to assess MMs in children with UCP and has an additional advantage of sensitivity to detect MMs.
介绍风车任务,这是一种新的客观评估工具,用于量化单侧脑瘫(UCP)儿童的镜像运动(MMs)的存在,这些运动通常通过基于观察的伍兹和特伯量表(W&T)进行评估。
前瞻性、观察性、队列初步研究。
儿童医院。
前瞻性队列的 UCP 儿童(N=23,年龄范围 6-15 岁,平均年龄 10.5±2.7 岁)。
不适用。
评估风车任务的同期有效性,并比较两种评估方法对 MM 检测的敏感性和特异性。为了评估同期有效性,将风车任务数据与 W&T 数据进行比较,使用 Spearman 等级相关系数(ρ)进行 2 种情况:患手运动与非患手运动。通过测量两种评估方法不一致评估的儿童的平均百分比来比较敏感性和特异性。
两种评估的结果均显著相关(患手运动:ρ=.520;P=.005;非患手运动:ρ=.488;P=.009)。然而,许多儿童在风车任务中显示出 MMs,但在 W&T 中没有(敏感性:患手运动:27.5%;非患手运动:40.6%)。只有 2 名儿童在 W&T 中显示出 MMs,但在风车任务中没有(特异性:患手运动:2.9%;非患手运动:1.4%)。
风车任务似乎是一种评估 UCP 儿童 MMs 的有效工具,具有检测 MMs 的敏感性优势。