Hill David M, Lloyd Sean, Hickerson William L
Regional One Health, Memphis, TN, USA.
The University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2018 Apr;53(2):121-124. doi: 10.1177/0018578717746418. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
Glycemic control in burn patients is critical for reducing infection and mortality. This study was conducted to assess the incidence and outcomes of hypoglycemia during continuous insulin infusions (CII). This institutional review board-approved study was a retrospective, single burn center, electronic chart review. Patients admitted between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2014, who received a CII were included. Patients with incomplete data or who received <24 hours of CII were excluded. Thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 6 were excluded. The average patient was a 52-year-old Caucasian male with a 33% total body surface area burn and an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score of 20.Hypoglycemia was present for 87 of 6540 hours of CII therapy (1.1%). Two-thirds experienced a serum glucose <70 mg/dL and half <60 mg/dL. The most commonly assessed reasons for the hypoglycemic episodes were protocol violations (47%) and glucose variability (30%). After multivariable logistic regression, only history of diabetes remained a statistically significant risk factor with an odds ratio of 15.4 (95% confidence interval: 2.5-95.1). Four different CII protocols were prescribed. All protocols had a high glucose variability, as assessed by hours / day within goal range (13.1 ± 2.5, 14.1 ± 3.1, 14.3 ± 2.4, 9.8; = .282). The amount of different protocols likely contributed to protocol violations and glucose variability. Our data demonstrate the need to create and consolidate usage to a single protocol in attempts to improve glycemic control.
烧伤患者的血糖控制对于降低感染率和死亡率至关重要。本研究旨在评估持续胰岛素输注(CII)期间低血糖的发生率及转归。这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究是一项回顾性、单烧伤中心的电子病历审查。纳入2013年1月1日至2014年10月31日期间接受CII治疗的患者。排除数据不完整或接受CII治疗时间<24小时的患者。38例患者符合纳入标准;6例被排除。患者平均为52岁的白人男性,全身表面积烧伤33%,急性生理与慢性健康状况评价(APACHE)II评分为20分。在6540小时的CII治疗中,有87小时出现低血糖(1.1%)。三分之二的患者血糖<70mg/dL,一半患者血糖<60mg/dL。低血糖发作最常见的评估原因是违反方案(47%)和血糖变异性(30%)。多变量逻辑回归分析后,只有糖尿病史仍是具有统计学意义的危险因素,比值比为15.4(95%置信区间:2.5 - 95.1)。制定了四种不同的CII方案。所有方案的血糖变异性都很高,以目标范围内的小时数/天评估(分别为13.1±2.5、14.1±3.1、14.3±2.4、9.8;P = 0.282)。不同方案的数量可能导致了违反方案和血糖变异性。我们的数据表明,有必要创建并整合为单一方案以改善血糖控制。