Suppr超能文献

管电压对低辐射剂量计算机断层扫描定量冠状动脉斑块分析的影响:体模研究

Influence of tube potential on quantitative coronary plaque analyses by low radiation dose computed tomography: a phantom study.

作者信息

Wang Chunhong, Liao Yuliang, Chen Haibin, Zhen Xin, Li Jianhong, Xu Yikai, Zhou Linghong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, 464002, Henan, China.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug;34(8):1315-1322. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1344-y. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that employing the low dose computed tomography (CT) technique based on low tube potential reduces the radiation dose required for the coronary artery examination protocol. However, low tube potential may adversely influence the CT number of plaque composition. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether quantitative atherosclerotic plaque analysis by a multi-slice, low radiation dose CT protocol using 80 kilovolts (kV) yields results comparable to those of the standard 120 kV protocol. Artificial plaque samples (n = 17) composed of three kinds of plaque were scanned at 120 and 80 kV. Relative low-density and medium-density plaque component volumes obtained by three protocols (80 kV, 60 Hounsfield units [HU] threshold; 120 kV, 60 HU threshold; and 80 kV, 82 HU threshold) were compared. Using the 60 HU threshold, relative volume of the low-density plaque component obtained at 80 kV was lower than that obtained at 120 kV (27 ± 3% vs. 51 ± 5%, P < 0.001), whereas relative volume of the medium-density plaque component obtained at 80 kV was higher than that obtained at 120 kV (73 ± 3% vs. 48 ± 5%, P < 0.001). By contrast, no significant difference in relative volume obtained at 80 kV (82 HU threshold) versus 120 kV (60 HU threshold) was observed for either low-density (52 ± 5% vs. 51 ± 5%) or medium-density (48 ± 5% vs. 48 ± 5%) plaque component. Low tube potential may affect the accuracy of quantitative atherosclerotic plaque analysis. For our phantom test, 82 HU was the optimal threshold for scanning at 80 kV.

摘要

先前的研究表明,采用基于低管电压的低剂量计算机断层扫描(CT)技术可降低冠状动脉检查方案所需的辐射剂量。然而,低管电压可能会对斑块成分的CT值产生不利影响。因此,我们旨在确定使用80千伏(kV)的多层、低辐射剂量CT方案进行定量动脉粥样硬化斑块分析的结果是否与标准的120 kV方案相当。由三种斑块组成的人工斑块样本(n = 17)在120 kV和80 kV下进行扫描。比较了三种方案(80 kV,60亨氏单位[HU]阈值;120 kV,60 HU阈值;80 kV,82 HU阈值)获得的相对低密度和中密度斑块成分体积。使用60 HU阈值时,80 kV下获得的低密度斑块成分相对体积低于120 kV下获得的(27±3%对51±5%,P < 0.001),而80 kV下获得的中密度斑块成分相对体积高于120 kV下获得的(73±3%对48±5%,P < 0.001)。相比之下,对于低密度(52±5%对51±5%)或中密度(48±5%对48±5%)斑块成分,在80 kV(82 HU阈值)与120 kV(60 HU阈值)下获得的相对体积没有显著差异。低管电压可能会影响定量动脉粥样硬化斑块分析的准确性。对于我们的体模测试,82 HU是80 kV扫描的最佳阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验