Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Kusatsu Heart Center, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
It has been shown that CT attenuation of noncalcified plaques depends on luminal contrast attenuation (LCA). Although tube potential (kilovolt [kV]) has been shown to exert influence on plaque attenuation through LCA as well as its direct effects, in-vivo studies have not investigated plaque attenuation at lower tube potentials less than 120 kV. We sought to evaluate the effect of kV and LCA on thresholds for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques as defined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
CT attenuation of IVUS-defined plaque components (lipid-rich, fibrous, and calcified plaques) were quantified in 52 consecutive patients with unstable angina, who had coronary CT angiography performed at 100 kV (n = 25) or 120 kV (n = 27) using kV-adjusted contrast protocol prior to IVUS. CT attenuation of plaque components was compared between the two groups.
LCA was similar in the 100-kV and 120-kV groups (417.6 ± 83.7 Hounsfield Units [HU] vs 421.3 ± 54.9 HU, p = 0.77). LCA correlated with CT attenuation of lipid-rich (r = 0.49, p = 0.001) and fibrous plaques (r = 0.32, p < 0.05), but not with that of calcified plaques (r = 0.04, p = 0.81). When plaque attenuation was normalized to LCA, lipid-rich (0.087 ± 0.036, range -0.012-0.147) and fibrous plaque attenuation (0.234 ± 0.056, range 0.153-0.394) were distinct (p < 0.001) with no overlap for both kV groups. CT attenuation was not significantly different between 100-kV and 120-kV groups for lipid-rich (34.0 ± 21.5 vs 39.3 ± 12.9, p = 0.33) or fibrous plaques (95.4 ± 19.1 vs 97.6 ± 22.0, p = 0.75).
Plaque attenuation thresholds for non-calcified plaque components should be adjusted based on LCA. Further adjustment may not be required for different tube potentials.
已经表明,非钙化斑块的 CT 衰减取决于管腔对比衰减(LCA)。尽管管电压(千伏)已被证明通过 LCA 以及其直接影响来对斑块衰减产生影响,但体内研究尚未在低于 120kV 的较低管电压下研究过斑块衰减。我们试图评估管电压和 LCA 对血管内超声(IVUS)定义的富含脂质和纤维斑块的阈值的影响。
对 52 例不稳定型心绞痛患者的 IVUS 定义的斑块成分(富含脂质、纤维和钙化斑块)的 CT 衰减进行定量分析,这些患者在进行 IVUS 检查之前,分别在 100kV(n=25)或 120kV(n=27)使用管电压调整对比方案进行了冠状动脉 CT 血管造影检查。比较两组之间斑块成分的 CT 衰减。
100kV 和 120kV 组的 LCA 相似(417.6±83.7Hounsfield Units[HU] vs 421.3±54.9HU,p=0.77)。LCA 与富含脂质的斑块(r=0.49,p=0.001)和纤维斑块(r=0.32,p<0.05)的 CT 衰减相关,但与钙化斑块的 CT 衰减不相关(r=0.04,p=0.81)。当将斑块衰减归一化为 LCA 时,富含脂质的斑块(0.087±0.036,范围-0.012-0.147)和纤维斑块衰减(0.234±0.056,范围 0.153-0.394)明显不同(p<0.001),两个管电压组之间没有重叠。100kV 和 120kV 组之间富含脂质的斑块(34.0±21.5 vs 39.3±12.9,p=0.33)或纤维斑块(95.4±19.1 vs 97.6±22.0,p=0.75)的 CT 衰减没有显著差异。
非钙化斑块成分的斑块衰减阈值应根据 LCA 进行调整。对于不同的管电压,可能不需要进一步调整。