• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用损伤风险曲线进行生物力学损伤指标选择来估计AROC的新方法。

Novel method of estimating AROC using an injury risk curve for biomechanical injury metric selection.

作者信息

Baker Alexander, Hsu Fang-Chi, Gayzik Scott

机构信息

a Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics , Winston-Salem , North Carolina.

b Department of Biostatistics , Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , North Carolina.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S174-S176. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1426903.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2018.1426903
PMID:29584486
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) is commonly used to evaluate an injury metric's ability to discriminate between injury and noninjury cases. However, AROC has limitations and may not handle censored data sets adequately. Survival methodology creates robust estimates of injury risk curves (IRCs) which accommodate censored data. We developed an observation-adjusted ROC (oaROC), an AROC-like statistic calculated from the IRC.

METHODS

oaROC uses an observational distribution and an IRC to measure true positive rate (TPR) and false positive rate (FPR). The oaROC represents what the AROC would be with a large number of observations sampled from the IRC. We verified this using a limit test with simulated data sets at various sample sizes drawn from an assumed "true" IRC. For each sample size, 5,000 different data sets were created; a conventional AROC was calculated for each data set and compared with the single oaROC, which was calculated from the "true" IRC and not dependent on sample size.

RESULTS

The oaROC, calculated from the simulated IRC, was 0.911. At a sample size of 20, the mean AROC was 0.930 (2.0% difference). At a sample size of 1,000, the mean AROC was 0.9114 (0.02% difference).

CONCLUSION

We verified that AROC approaches the oaROC with increasing sample sizes, and oaROC presents a measure of IRC discriminatory ability. Survival methodology can estimate IRCs using censored observations and the oaROC was designed with this in mind. The oaROC may be a useful measure of discrimination for data sets containing censored data. Further investigation is needed to evaluate oaROC calculated from estimated IRCs.

摘要

目的

受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AROC)常用于评估损伤指标区分损伤与非损伤病例的能力。然而,AROC存在局限性,可能无法充分处理删失数据集。生存分析方法能对损伤风险曲线(IRC)进行稳健估计,可处理删失数据。我们开发了一种观察调整后的ROC(oaROC),这是一种从IRC计算得出的类似AROC的统计量。

方法

oaROC使用观察分布和IRC来测量真阳性率(TPR)和假阳性率(FPR)。oaROC代表从IRC中抽取大量观察值时的AROC。我们通过对从假定的“真实”IRC中抽取的不同样本量的模拟数据集进行极限检验来验证这一点。对于每个样本量,创建了5000个不同的数据集;为每个数据集计算传统的AROC,并与从“真实”IRC计算得出且不依赖于样本量的单个oaROC进行比较。

结果

从模拟的IRC计算得出的oaROC为0.911。样本量为20时,平均AROC为0.930(差异2.0%)。样本量为1000时,平均AROC为0.9114(差异0.02%)。

结论

我们验证了随着样本量增加,AROC趋近于oaROC,且oaROC体现了IRC的区分能力。生存分析方法可使用删失观察值估计IRC,而oaROC正是基于此设计的。对于包含删失数据的数据集,oaROC可能是一种有用的区分度量。需要进一步研究以评估从估计的IRC计算得出的oaROC。

相似文献

1
Novel method of estimating AROC using an injury risk curve for biomechanical injury metric selection.利用损伤风险曲线进行生物力学损伤指标选择来估计AROC的新方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S174-S176. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1426903.
2
A method to measure predictive ability of an injury risk curve using an observation-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.一种使用观察值调整后的受试者工作特征曲线下面积来测量损伤风险曲线预测能力的方法。
J Biomech. 2018 Apr 27;72:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Novel learning framework (knockoff technique) to evaluate metric ranking algorithms to describe human response to injury.用于评估度量排序算法以描述人类对损伤反应的新型学习框架(仿冒技术)。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S121-S126. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1519805. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Statistical simulations to evaluate the methods of the construction of injury risk curves.评估伤害风险曲线构建方法的统计模拟。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2011 Nov;55:411-40. doi: 10.4271/2011-22-0015.
5
Development of an injury risk curve for pelvic fracture in vertical loading environments.垂直载荷环境下骨盆骨折损伤风险曲线的建立。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S178-S181. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532221.
6
Hierarchical process using Brier Score Metrics for lower leg injury risk curves in vertical impact.使用布赖尔评分指标的分层过程,用于垂直冲击中下腿部损伤风险曲线。
BMJ Mil Health. 2020 Oct;166(5):318-323. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2018-001124. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Methodology for Evaluation of WIAMan Injury Assessment Reference Curves Using Whole Body Match-Paired Data.基于全身匹配对数据评估 WIAMan 损伤评估参考曲线的方法。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Nov;49(11):3128-3142. doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02770-7. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Statistical characteristics of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a simple prognostic model using traditional and bootstrapped approaches.使用传统方法和自举法的简单预后模型的受试者操作特征曲线下面积的统计特征。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 May;55(5):518-24. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00512-1.
9
Prediction of thoracic injury severity in frontal impacts by selected anatomical morphomic variables through model-averaged logistic regression approach.通过模型平均逻辑回归方法,利用选定的解剖形态变量预测正面碰撞中的胸部损伤严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
10
Predicting hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients according to acute kidney injury severity.根据急性肾损伤严重程度预测重症癌症患者的住院死亡率。
Oncology. 2011;80(3-4):160-6. doi: 10.1159/000329042. Epub 2011 Jun 15.