Suppr超能文献

侧面碰撞时顶部系带的有效性。

Top tether effectiveness during side impacts.

作者信息

Majstorovic Jordan, Bing Julie, Dahle Eric, Bolte John, Kang Yun-Seok

机构信息

a The Ohio State University, Injury Biomechanics Research Center , Columbus , Ohio.

b Evenflo , Miamisburg , Ohio.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S146-S152. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1397643.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have looked at the effectiveness of the top tether during side impacts. In these studies, limited anthropomorphic test device (ATD) data were collected and/or few side impact scenarios were observed. The goal of this study was to further understand the effects of the top tether on ATD responses and child restraint system (CRS) kinematics during various side impact conditions.

METHODS

A series of high-speed near-side and far-side sled tests were performed using the FMVSS213 side impact sled buck and Q3s ATD. Tests were performed at both 10° and 30° impacts with respect to the pure lateral direction. Two child restraints, CRS A and CRS B, were attached to the bench using flexible lower anchors. Each test scenario was performed with the presence and absence of a top tether. Instrumentation recorded Q3s responses and CRS kinematics, and the identical test scenarios with and without a top tether attachment were compared.

RESULTS

For the far-side lateral (10°) and oblique (30°) impacts, top tether attachment increased resultant head accelerations by 8-38% and head injury criterion (HIC) values by 20-140%. However, the top tether was effective in reducing lateral head excursion by 5-25%. For near-side impacts, the top tether resulted in less than 10% increases in both resultant head acceleration and HIC in the lateral impact direction. For near-side oblique impacts, the top tether increased HIC by 17.3% for CRS A and decreased it by 19.5% for CRS B. However, the injury values determined from both impact conditions were below current injury assessment reference values (IARVs). Additionally, the top tether proved beneficial in preventing forward and lateral CRS rotations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the effects of the top tether on Q3s responses were dependent on impact type, impact angle, and CRS. Tether attachments that increased head accelerations and HIC values were generally counterbalanced by a reduction in head excursion and CRS rotation compared to nontethered scenarios.

摘要

目的

很少有研究关注顶部系绳在侧面碰撞中的有效性。在这些研究中,收集的人体模型试验装置(ATD)数据有限,并且/或者观察到的侧面碰撞场景较少。本研究的目的是进一步了解在各种侧面碰撞条件下,顶部系绳对ATD响应和儿童约束系统(CRS)运动学的影响。

方法

使用FMVSS213侧面碰撞雪橇支架和Q3s ATD进行了一系列高速近侧和远侧雪橇试验。相对于纯横向方向,在10°和30°碰撞角度下均进行了试验。使用柔性下部固定点将两个儿童约束装置CRS A和CRS B固定在试验台上。每个试验场景均在有和没有顶部系绳的情况下进行。仪器记录了Q3s响应和CRS运动学,并对有和没有顶部系绳连接的相同试验场景进行了比较。

结果

对于远侧横向(10°)和倾斜(30°)碰撞,顶部系绳连接使合成头部加速度增加了8%-38%,头部损伤准则(HIC)值增加了20%-140%。然而,顶部系绳有效地将头部横向偏移减少了5%-25%。对于近侧碰撞,顶部系绳使横向碰撞方向上的合成头部加速度和HIC增加均不到10%。对于近侧倾斜碰撞,顶部系绳使CRS A的HIC增加了17.3%,使CRS B的HIC降低了19.5%。然而,从两种碰撞条件确定的损伤值均低于当前损伤评估参考值(IARV)。此外,顶部系绳在防止CRS向前和横向旋转方面被证明是有益的。

结论

结果表明,顶部系绳对Q3s响应的影响取决于碰撞类型、碰撞角度和CRS。与无系绳场景相比,增加头部加速度和HIC值的系绳连接通常会因头部偏移和CRS旋转的减少而得到平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验