Department of Neurology, Neuro-surgery, and Radiology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Uni-versity, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Department of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Dec 1;15(6):624-633. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy020.
Flow diverting devices (FDDs) have revolutionized the treatment of morphologically complex intracranial aneurysms such as wide-necked, giant, or fusiform aneurysms. Although FDDs are extremely effective, they carry a small yet significant risk of intraprocedural complications. As the implementation of these devices increases, the ability to predict and rapidly treat complications, especially those that are iatrogenic or intraprocedural in nature, is becoming increasingly more necessary.Our objective in this paper is to provide a descriptive summary of the various types of intraprocedural complications that may occur during FDDs deployment and how they may best be treated. A systematic and qualitative review of the literature was conducted using electronic databases MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Searches consisted of Boolean operators "AND" and "OR" for the following terms in different combinations: "aneurysm," "endovascular," "flow diverter," "intracranial," and "pipeline."A total of 94 papers were included in our analysis; approximately 87 of these papers dealt with periprocedural endovascular (mainly related to FDDs) complications and their treatment; 7 studies concerned background material. The main categories of periprocedural complications encountered during deployment of FDDs are failure of occlusion, parent vessel injury and/or rupture, spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage, migration or malposition of the FDDs, thromboembolic or ischemic events, and side branch occlusionPeriprocedural complications occur mainly due to thromboembolic events or mechanical issues related to device deployment and placement. With increasing use and expanding versatility of FDDs, the understanding of these complications is vital in order to effectively manage such situations in a timely manner.
血流导向装置(FDD)的出现彻底改变了颅内形态复杂的动脉瘤的治疗方式,例如宽颈、巨大或梭形动脉瘤。尽管 FDD 非常有效,但它仍存在一定的术中并发症风险,尽管风险很小,但却不容忽视。随着这些装置的应用越来越广泛,预测和快速处理并发症的能力变得越来越重要,尤其是那些医源性或术中发生的并发症。
我们的目的是对 FDD 置入过程中可能发生的各种类型的术中并发症进行描述性总结,并探讨如何对这些并发症进行最佳治疗。我们使用 MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 电子数据库对文献进行了系统的定性分析。搜索词包括“动脉瘤”“血管内”“血流导向装置”“颅内”和“血流导向管”等术语,以不同组合形式采用“与”和“或”布尔运算符。
我们共纳入了 94 篇文献,其中约 87 篇文献涉及围手术期血管内(主要与 FDD 相关)并发症及其治疗,7 篇文献涉及背景资料。FDD 置入过程中遇到的围手术期并发症主要有:闭塞失败、载瘤动脉损伤和/或破裂、自发性脑实质内出血、FDD 迁移或位置不当、血栓栓塞或缺血性事件以及分支闭塞。
围手术期并发症主要是由于血栓栓塞事件或与装置置入和放置相关的机械问题引起的。随着 FDD 的应用日益广泛,其功能不断扩展,深入了解这些并发症对于及时有效地处理这些情况至关重要。