文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

载药微球与碘化油动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的短期疗效及安全性比较:一项短期疗效和安全性研究。

CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No. 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1368-8.


DOI:10.1186/s12957-018-1368-8
PMID:29587773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5870383/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres Beads loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) in the treatment of Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to conventional TACE (cTACE). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with HCC treated by TACE from June 2016 to February 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. These included 24 cases in the DEB-TACE group and 30 cases in the cTACE group. The clinical efficacy, tumor recurrence rate, and complications were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, liver function tests and alpha-feto protein levels were compared between the two groups before and at 1 week and 1 month after interventional treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics (p > 0.05). Tumor response rates and disease control rates in the DEB-TACE group were significantly higher than those in the cTACE group at 3 and 6 months after treatment (p < 0.05). Recurrence rates at 6 months were significantly higher for cTACE compared to DEB-TACE (43.3 vs. 16.7%; p = 0.036). At 1 month, the AFP level in the DEB-TACE group was significantly lower than that in the cTACE group (p = 0.008). At the end of follow-up, four cases in the DEB-TACE group and two cases in the cTACE group were treated with salvage surgery after downstaging the disease. Liver function of both groups improved at 1 month. However, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels in the DEB-TACE group were better than those in the cTACE group (p < 0.05). The incidence of DOX-related complications in the DEB-TACE group was significantly lower than in the cTACE group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The short-term efficacy of DEB-TACE is better, and the complication rates are lower compared to cTACE in the treatment of Chinese patients with HCC. However, long-term clinical efficacy and survival benefit should be analyzed in future studies.

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估与传统 TACE(cTACE)相比,载多柔比星(DOX)的 CalliSpheres 微球药物洗脱珠经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)治疗中国肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的短期疗效和安全性。

方法:回顾性分析 2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 2 月期间采用 TACE 治疗的 54 例 HCC 患者,其中 DEB-TACE 组 24 例,cTACE 组 30 例。比较两组的临床疗效、肿瘤复发率和并发症。此外,比较两组患者介入治疗前后 1 周和 1 个月的肝功能和甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平。

结果:两组基线特征无显著差异(p>0.05)。治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月,DEB-TACE 组的肿瘤反应率和疾病控制率明显高于 cTACE 组(p<0.05)。cTACE 组 6 个月时的复发率明显高于 DEB-TACE 组(43.3%比 16.7%;p=0.036)。治疗后 1 个月,DEB-TACE 组 AFP 水平明显低于 cTACE 组(p=0.008)。随访结束时,DEB-TACE 组 4 例和 cTACE 组 2 例经降期后行挽救性手术治疗。两组患者在 1 个月时肝功能均有改善。然而,DEB-TACE 组的丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶和总胆红素水平均优于 cTACE 组(p<0.05)。DEB-TACE 组 DOX 相关并发症发生率明显低于 cTACE 组(p<0.05)。

结论:与 cTACE 相比,DEB-TACE 治疗中国 HCC 患者的短期疗效更好,并发症发生率更低。然而,未来的研究还需要分析其长期临床疗效和生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/429a/5870383/d3e7682d3612/12957_2018_1368_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/429a/5870383/d3e7682d3612/12957_2018_1368_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/429a/5870383/d3e7682d3612/12957_2018_1368_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.

World J Surg Oncol. 2018-3-27

[2]
Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019-7

[3]
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BMC Cancer. 2015-6-10

[4]
Five-year outcome of conventional and drug-eluting transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2018-8-3

[5]
Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety.

BMC Cancer. 2019-11-29

[6]
Efficacy of CalliSpheres drug-loaded microspheres combined with doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024-9

[7]
Callispheres® drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization might be an efficient and safety down-staging therapy in unresectable liver cancer patients.

World J Surg Oncol. 2022-8-9

[8]
Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021-10

[9]
CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is equally efficient and safe in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional TACE treatments: a result from CTILC study.

Clin Transl Oncol. 2018-7-12

[10]
Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Emphasis on the impact of tumor size.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Systematic review of transarterial chemoembolization for desmoid tumors: a promising locoregional treatment for challenging tumor.

Discov Oncol. 2025-7-1

[2]
Conversion therapy with TACE, TKIs, and ICIs for unresectable BCLC stage B and C hepatocellular carcinoma.

Front Immunol. 2025-6-10

[3]
Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization vs conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in adult patients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis of observational studies.

Front Oncol. 2025-2-12

[4]
Drug-eluting beads chemoembolization combined with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor and lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinoma.

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024-11-15

[5]
Comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial.

Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024-11-13

[6]
Gelation embolism agents suppress clinical TACE-incited pro-metastatic microenvironment against hepatocellular carcinoma progression.

EBioMedicine. 2024-11

[7]
Small particle drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization combined with targeted therapy in the clinical treatment of unresectable liver cancer.

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024-10-15

[8]
Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-8-9

[9]
A Simple Prognostic Scoring System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with DEB-TACE.

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024-7-10

[10]
Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score matching.

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024-6-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparison of pharmacokinetics and drug release in tissues after transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin using diverse lipiodol emulsions and CalliSpheres Beads in rabbit livers.

Drug Deliv. 2017-11

[2]
Update on Embolization Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Curr Oncol Rep. 2017-6

[3]
Transarterial chemoembolization using gelatin sponges or microspheres plus lipiodol-doxorubicin versus doxorubicin-loaded beads for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Korean J Radiol. 2015

[4]
Transarterial chemoembolization vs. conservative treatment for unresectable infiltrating hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective comparative study.

Mol Clin Oncol. 2014-11

[5]
Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with HepaSphere 30-60 μm. Safety and efficacy study.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014-2

[6]
Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) using Drug Eluting Beads. Implications for clinical practice and trial design.

J Hepatol. 2012-2-5

[7]
Chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Decreased toxicity with slow-release doxorubicin‑eluting beads compared with lipiodol.

Oncol Rep. 2012-1-25

[8]
Combination therapy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and arterial administration of antiangiogenesis on VX2 liver tumor.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011-6-14

[9]
Transarterial Chemoembolization of Child-A hepatocellular carcinoma: drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB TACE) vs. TACE with cisplatin/lipiodol (cTACE).

Med Sci Monit. 2011-4

[10]
[Comparison of doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma].

Radiologia. 2011

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索