Department of Intensive Care Unit, Beijing You An Hospital Affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep;59(9):1087-1092. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2390025. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
This study compared the efficacy and safety of the transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads loading with doxorubicin (DEB-TACE) versus conventional lipiodol (cTACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 144 patients, who were randomly assigned to receive either DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres or cTACE with doxorubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Patients were followed up for 12 months, with assessments at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate (CR), and the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety profile of the two treatments.
The results showed that DEB-TACE was superior to cTACE in terms of CR (50.0% vs 30.6% at 3 months, = 0.03; 43.1% vs 25.0% at 12 months, = 0.04), OS (18.2 months vs 14.6 months, < 0.05), and PFS (7.4 months vs 4.8 months, < 0.05), and that the safety profile of the two treatments was similar ( > 0.05 for all comparisons). However, the efficacy of DEB-TACE and cTACE varied according to the tumor morphology. DEB-TACE showed better CR rates in patients with nodular tumors, while no significant difference in CR between the two groups in patients with infiltrative tumors.
DEB-TACE showed superior efficacy to cTACE in terms of CR, OS, and PFS, particularly in patients with nodular tumors, while maintaining a similar safety profile. These findings suggest that tumor morphology could inform treatment decisions for TACE in HCC patients.
本研究比较了载多柔比星的 CalliSpheres 载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞(DEB-TACE)与常规碘油(cTACE)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效和安全性。
一项随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了 144 例患者,他们被随机分配接受载多柔比星的 CalliSpheres 微球 DEB-TACE 或载多柔比星碘油乳剂 cTACE。患者接受了 12 个月的随访,在治疗后 3 个月和 12 个月进行评估。主要终点是临床缓解率(CR),次要终点是总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和两种治疗方法的安全性。
结果显示,在 CR(3 个月时分别为 50.0%和 30.6%, = 0.03;12 个月时分别为 43.1%和 25.0%, = 0.04)、OS(18.2 个月比 14.6 个月, < 0.05)和 PFS(7.4 个月比 4.8 个月, < 0.05)方面,DEB-TACE 均优于 cTACE,且两种治疗方法的安全性相似(所有比较均 > 0.05)。然而,DEB-TACE 和 cTACE 的疗效根据肿瘤形态而有所不同。DEB-TACE 在结节性肿瘤患者中显示出更高的 CR 率,而在浸润性肿瘤患者中两组之间的 CR 无显著差异。
DEB-TACE 在 CR、OS 和 PFS 方面优于 cTACE,特别是在结节性肿瘤患者中,同时保持相似的安全性。这些发现表明,肿瘤形态可能为 HCC 患者的 TACE 治疗决策提供信息。