• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感觉运动同步敲击时运动信息的模态依赖效应

Modality-dependent effect of motion information in sensory-motor synchronised tapping.

作者信息

Ono Kentaro

机构信息

Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2018 May 14;675:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.055. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.055
PMID:29588176
Abstract

Synchronised action is important for everyday life. Generally, the auditory domain is more sensitive for coding temporal information, and previous studies have shown that auditory-motor synchronisation is much more precise than visuo-motor synchronisation. Interestingly, adding motion information improves synchronisation with visual stimuli and the advantage of the auditory modality seems to diminish. However, whether adding motion information also improves auditory-motor synchronisation remains unknown. This study compared tapping accuracy with a stationary or moving stimulus in both auditory and visual modalities. Participants were instructed to tap in synchrony with the onset of a sound or flash in the stationary condition, while these stimuli were perceived as moving from side to side in the motion condition. The results demonstrated that synchronised tapping with a moving visual stimulus was significantly more accurate than tapping with a stationary visual stimulus, as previous studies have shown. However, tapping with a moving auditory stimulus was significantly poorer than tapping with a stationary auditory stimulus. Although motion information impaired audio-motor synchronisation, an advantage of auditory modality compared to visual modality still existed. These findings are likely the result of higher temporal resolution in the auditory domain, which is likely due to the physiological and structural differences in the auditory and visual pathways in the brain.

摘要

同步行动对日常生活很重要。一般来说,听觉领域在编码时间信息方面更为敏感,先前的研究表明,听觉-运动同步比视觉-运动同步要精确得多。有趣的是,添加运动信息可改善与视觉刺激的同步,而且听觉模态的优势似乎会减弱。然而,添加运动信息是否也能改善听觉-运动同步仍不清楚。本研究比较了在听觉和视觉模态下,参与者对静止或移动刺激的敲击准确性。在静止条件下,参与者被要求与声音或闪光的起始同步敲击,而在运动条件下,这些刺激被感知为从一侧移动到另一侧。结果表明,正如先前研究所示,与移动视觉刺激同步敲击比与静止视觉刺激同步敲击显著更准确。然而,与移动听觉刺激同步敲击比与静止听觉刺激同步敲击明显更差。尽管运动信息损害了听觉-运动同步,但听觉模态相对于视觉模态的优势仍然存在。这些发现可能是由于听觉领域具有更高的时间分辨率,这可能是由于大脑中听觉和视觉通路的生理和结构差异所致。

相似文献

1
Modality-dependent effect of motion information in sensory-motor synchronised tapping.感觉运动同步敲击时运动信息的模态依赖效应
Neurosci Lett. 2018 May 14;675:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.055. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
Is there a link between sensorimotor coordination and inter-manual coordination? Differential effects of auditory and/or visual rhythmic stimulations.感觉运动协调与双手协调之间存在联系吗?听觉和/或视觉节律刺激的不同影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3261-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4394-6. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
The influence of pacer-movement continuity and pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation.起搏运动的连续性和模式匹配对听觉-运动同步的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2705-2713. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05625-9. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.听觉与移动或静止视觉刺激之间同步性的判断。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Dec;61(4):277-92. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007028.
5
Dynamic modulation of cortico-muscular coupling during real and imagined sensorimotor synchronisation.真实和想象的感觉运动同步过程中皮质-肌肉耦合的动态调制
Neuroimage. 2021 Sep;238:118209. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118209. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli.在应用视觉和听觉节奏刺激进行有节奏的手指敲击过程中的皮质激活。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Sep;10(1-2):51-66. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00022-7.
7
Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.运动感觉时间重新校准中的听觉优势
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1249-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4497-0. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
0 + 1 > 1: How adding noninformative sound improves performance on a visual task.0+1>1:添加非信息性声音如何提高视觉任务的表现。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420662. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing.听觉-运动而非视觉-运动的时间重新校准可加快感觉处理。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):e0189242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189242. eCollection 2017.
10
Motion-induced disturbance of auditory-motor synchronization and its modulation by transcranial direct current stimulation.运动诱发的听觉-运动同步障碍及其经颅直流电刺激的调节作用。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Feb;43(4):509-15. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13135. Epub 2015 Dec 28.