• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interprofessional Collaboration between General Physicians and Emergency Department Teams in Belgium: A Qualitative Study.比利时全科医生与急诊科团队之间的跨专业协作:一项定性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Oct 2;17(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2520.
2
On the edge of decision-making in trauma care: A focus group study on radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration.在创伤护理决策的边缘:一项关于放射技师跨专业协作经验的焦点小组研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2023 Oct;29(6):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Patients' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between health care professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review.患者对住院期间医护专业人员跨专业协作的看法:一项定性系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jun;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00121.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research.比较医疗保健中的跨专业和跨组织合作:定性研究的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
6
Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists.纳入非配药药剂师后全科医疗团队内部的跨专业协作。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Mar 21;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00550-3.
7
Understanding the distinct experience of rural interprofessional collaboration in developing palliative care programs.了解农村跨专业合作在制定姑息治疗计划方面的独特经验。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(2):2711. Epub 2014 May 14.
8
9
Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.农村环境中的孕产护理模式:与助产士开展跨专业合作的障碍和特征。
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Collaboration in teams with nurse practitioners and general practitioners during out-of-hours and implications for patient care; a qualitative study.非工作时间与执业护士和全科医生团队合作及其对患者护理的影响:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2548-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Is palliative care a utopia for older patients with organ failure, dementia or frailty? A qualitative study through the prism of emergency department admission.临终关怀是否是器官衰竭、痴呆或虚弱的老年患者的乌托邦?通过急诊科入院的棱镜进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11242-2.
2
Family physicians collaborating for health system integration: a scoping review.家庭医生协作促进医疗系统整合:综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09063-w.
3
What does Success Look Like for Leaders of Integrated Health and Social Care Systems? a Realist Review.综合健康与社会护理系统领导者的成功是什么样的?一项现实主义综述。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Nov 26;21(4):26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5936. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
4
What Makes Integration of Chronic Care so Difficult? A Macro-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators in Belgium.是什么让慢性病护理的整合如此困难?比利时障碍与促进因素的宏观层面分析。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5671. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
5
Patients' perceptions of continuity of care across primary care level and emergency departments in Belgium: cross-sectional survey.比利时患者对初级保健机构和急诊科之间医疗连续性的认知:横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e033188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033188.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced emergency room and hospital utilization in persons with multiple chronic conditions and disability receiving home-based primary care.接受家庭初级保健的患有多种慢性病和残疾的人群急诊室和医院利用率降低。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Apr;10(2):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
2
Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly.老年人跨专业协作干预的结果指标
Int J Integr Care. 2016 May 16;16(2):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2017.
3
'Gearing Up' to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework.“做好准备”以改善基层医疗中的跨专业协作:一项系统综述和概念框架
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 20;17:83. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0492-1.
4
Pharmacy students' attitudes towards physician-pharmacist collaboration: Intervention effect of integrating cooperative learning into an interprofessional team-based community service.药学专业学生对医生 - 药剂师合作的态度:将合作学习融入基于跨专业团队的社区服务的干预效果
J Interprof Care. 2016 Sep;30(5):591-8. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1185095. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients' care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors.基层医疗中关于患者护理计划的跨专业协作:一项关于影响因素的焦点小组研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 May 28;17:58. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0456-5.
6
Improving Care And Research Electronic Data Trust Antwerp (iCAREdata): a research database of linked data on out-of-hours primary care.改善安特卫普医疗与研究电子数据信任(iCAREdata):一个关于非工作时间初级医疗保健关联数据的研究数据库。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 May 4;9:259. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2055-x.
7
Facilitating Implementation of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices Into Primary Care: A Trilogy of Driving Forces.
J Healthc Manag. 2015 Jul-Aug;60(4):287-300.
8
The common characteristics and outcomes of multidisciplinary collaboration in primary health care: a systematic literature review.初级卫生保健中多学科协作的共同特征与成果:一项系统文献综述
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Jun 24;15:e027. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1359. eCollection 2015 Apr-Jun.
9
Closing the circle of care: implementation of a web-based communication tool to improve emergency department discharge communication with family physicians.闭合医疗照护循环:实施基于网络的沟通工具以改善急诊科与家庭医生之间的出院沟通。
CJEM. 2015 Mar;17(2):123-30. doi: 10.2310/8000.2014.141327.
10
The association between patient activation and medication adherence, hospitalization, and emergency room utilization in patients with chronic illnesses: a systematic review.慢性病患者的患者激活与药物依从性、住院率及急诊室利用率之间的关联:一项系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 May;98(5):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

比利时全科医生与急诊科团队之间的跨专业协作:一项定性研究。

Interprofessional Collaboration between General Physicians and Emergency Department Teams in Belgium: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Karam Marlène, Tricas-Sauras Sandra, Darras Elisabeth, Macq Jean

机构信息

Catholic University of Louvain, BE.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2017 Oct 2;17(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2520.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.2520
PMID:29588632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5853879/
Abstract

This study aimed to assess interprofessional collaboration between general physicians and emergency departments in the French speaking regions of Belgium. Eight group interviews were conducted both in rural and urban areas, including in Brussels. Findings showed that the relational components of collaboration, which are highly valued by individuals involved, comprise mutual acquaintanceship and trust, shared power and objectives. The organizational components of collaboration included out-of-hours services, role clarification, leadership and overall environment. Communication and patient's role were also found to be key elements in enhancing or hindering collaboration across these two levels of care. Relationships between general physicians and emergency departments' teams were tightly linked to organizational factors and the general macro-environment. Health system regulation did not appear to play a significant role in promoting collaboration between actors. A better role clarification is needed in order to foster multidisciplinary team coordination for a more efficient patient management. Finally, economic power and private practice impeded interprofessional collaboration between the care teams. In conclusion, many challenges need to be addressed for achievement of a better collaboration and more efficient integration. Not only should integration policies aim at reinforcing the role of general physicians as gatekeepers, also they should target patients' awareness and empowerment.

摘要

本研究旨在评估比利时法语区全科医生与急诊科之间的跨专业协作。在农村和城市地区(包括布鲁塞尔)进行了八次小组访谈。研究结果表明,协作的关系要素受到相关人员的高度重视,包括相互认识和信任、共享权力和目标。协作的组织要素包括非工作时间服务、角色明确、领导力和整体环境。沟通和患者的角色也是影响这两个护理层面协作加强或受阻的关键因素。全科医生与急诊科团队之间的关系与组织因素和总体宏观环境紧密相连。卫生系统监管似乎在促进行为主体之间的协作方面未发挥重要作用。为了促进多学科团队协调以实现更高效的患者管理,需要更好地明确角色。最后,经济实力和私人执业阻碍了护理团队之间的跨专业协作。总之,要实现更好的协作和更高效的整合,需要应对许多挑战。整合政策不仅应旨在加强全科医生作为守门人的作用,还应提高患者的意识并增强其能力。