专用分叉支架的必要性：批判性分析
The Need For Dedicated Bifurcation Stents: A Critical Analysis.
作者信息
Lesiak Maciej
机构信息
Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
出版信息
Interv Cardiol. 2016 Oct;11(2):124-127. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:22:2.
Abstract
There is growing evidence that optimally performed two-stent techniques may provide similar or better results compared with the simple techniques for bifurcation lesions, with an observed trend towards improvements in clinical and/or angiographic outcomes with a two-stent strategy. Yet, provisional stenting remains the treatment of choice. Here, the author discusses the evidence - and controversies - concerning when and how to use complex techniques.
摘要
越来越多的证据表明，与用于分叉病变的简单技术相比，最佳实施的双支架技术可能会提供相似或更好的结果，并且观察到双支架策略在临床和/或血管造影结果方面有改善的趋势。然而，临时支架置入术仍然是首选治疗方法。在此，作者讨论了有关何时以及如何使用复杂技术的证据和争议。
相似文献
1
The Need For Dedicated Bifurcation Stents: A Critical Analysis.
Interv Cardiol. 2016 Oct;11(2):124-127. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:22:2.
2
5-Year clinical follow-up of the COBRA (complex coronary bifurcation lesions: Randomized comparison of a strategy using a dedicated self-expanding biolimus A9-eluting stent vs. a culotte strategy using everolimus-eluting stents) study.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):E375-E380. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27597. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031.
4
Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach.
J Interv Cardiol. 2001 Dec;14(6):573-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2001.tb00375.x.
5
A multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in bifurcation lesions treated with a single-stenting technique: six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical results of the drug-eluting balloon in bifurcations trial.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1138-46. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23499. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
How to optimize the percutaneous treatment of bifurcated lesions: dedicated stents vs. provisional stenting.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2013 Oct;61(5):575-90.
8
Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2):e004497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497.
9
Outcomes of a dedicated stent in coronary bifurcations with large side branches: A subanalysis of the randomized TRYTON bifurcation study.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):1231-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26240. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
10
Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Heart. 2009 Oct;95(20):1676-81. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.168641. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
引用本文的文献
1
A Systematic Literature Review of Three Stenting Strategies for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery Disease.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2019 Apr 26;6(2):95-105. doi: 10.36469/9746. eCollection 2019.
本文引用的文献
1
The EBC TWO Study (European Bifurcation Coronary TWO): A Randomized Comparison of Provisional T-Stenting Versus a Systematic 2 Stent Culotte Strategy in Large Caliber True Bifurcations.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003643.
2
Dedicated Bifurcation Stent for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions Involving Large Side Branches: Outcomes From the Tryton Confirmatory Study.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 11;9(13):1338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.042.
3
Regular drug-eluting stents versus the dedicated coronary bifurcation sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM® stent: the randomised, multicentre, open-label, controlled POLBOS II trial.
EuroIntervention. 2016 Dec 10;12(11):e1404-e1412. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M11_11.
4
Long-term effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM® dedicated bifurcation stent in the treatment of distal left main stenosis: an international registry.
EuroIntervention. 2016 Nov 20;12(10):1246-1254. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M10_05.
5
Outcomes of a dedicated stent in coronary bifurcations with large side branches: A subanalysis of the randomized TRYTON bifurcation study.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):1231-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26240. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
6
Differential Prognostic Effect Between First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1318-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.014.
7
COmplex coronary Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a strategy using a dedicated self-expanding biolimus-eluting stent versus a culotte strategy using everolimus-eluting stents: primary results of the COBRA trial.
EuroIntervention. 2016 Apr 20;11(13):1457-67. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M05_02.
8
Regular Drug-Eluting Stent vs Dedicated Coronary Bifurcation BiOSS Expert Stent: Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled POLBOS I Trial.
Can J Cardiol. 2015 May;31(5):671-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.12.024. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
9
A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031.
10
A "simplified" culotte technique using two dedicated bifurcation stents and additional angiographic stent enhancement to treat a complex bifurcation lesion in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with poor left ventricular function.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;85(6):E163-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25795. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
Zotero 插件