Hildick-Smith David, Behan Miles W, Lassen Jens F, Chieffo Alaide, Lefèvre Thierry, Stankovic Goran, Burzotta Francesco, Pan Manuel, Ferenc Miroslaw, Bennett Lorraine, Hovasse Thomas, Spence Mark J, Oldroyd Keith, Brunel Philippe, Carrie Didier, Baumbach Andreas, Maeng Michael, Skipper Nicola, Louvard Yves
From the Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, United Kingdom (D.H.-S., L.B., N.S.); Edinburgh Heart Centre, United Kingdom (M.W.B.); Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark (J.F.L., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy (A.C.); Institute Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Hospital Privé Jacques Cartier, Massy, France (T.L., T.H., Y.L.); Department of Cardiology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade (G.S.); Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Serbia (G.S.); Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy (F.B.); Department of Cardiology, Reina Sofia Hospital, University of Cordoba, Spain (M.P.); University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany (M.F.); Department of Cardiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom (M.J.S.); Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom (K.O.); Department of Cardiology, Clinique de Fontaine-les-Djon, France (P.B.); Department of Cardiology, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France (D.C.); and Bristol Heart Institute, United Kingdom (A.B.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003643.
For the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, a provisional strategy is superior to systematic 2-stent techniques for the most bifurcation lesions. However, complex anatomies with large side branches (SBs) with significant ostial disease length are considered by expert consensus to warrant a 2-stent technique upfront. This consensus view has not been scientifically assessed.
Symptomatic patients with large caliber true bifurcation lesions (SB diameter ≥2.5 mm) and significant ostial disease length (≥5 mm) were randomized to either a provisional T-stent strategy or a dual stent culotte technique. Two hundred patients aged 64±10 years, 82% male, were randomized in 20 European centers. The clinical presentations were stable coronary disease (69%) and acute coronary syndromes (31%). SB stent diameter (2.67±0.27 mm) and length (20.30±5.89 mm) confirmed the extent of SB disease. Procedural success (provisional 97%, culotte 94%) and kissing balloon inflation (provisional 95%, culotte 98%) were high. Sixteen percent of patients in the provisional group underwent T-stenting. The primary end point (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 12 months) occurred in 7.7% of the provisional T-stent group versus 10.3% of the culotte group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.34; P=0.53). Procedure time, x-ray dose, and cost all favored the simpler procedure.
When treating complex coronary bifurcation lesions with large stenosed SBs, there is no difference between a provisional T-stent strategy and a systematic 2-stent culotte strategy in a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 12 months.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 01560455.
对于冠状动脉分叉病变的治疗,对于大多数分叉病变,临时策略优于系统性双支架技术。然而,专家共识认为,对于具有较大边支(SB)且开口病变长度显著的复杂解剖结构,一开始就采用双支架技术是必要的。这一共识观点尚未经过科学评估。
有症状的大口径真性分叉病变(SB直径≥2.5mm)且开口病变长度显著(≥5mm)的患者被随机分为临时T支架策略组或双支架裤裙边技术组。200例年龄为64±10岁、82%为男性的患者在20个欧洲中心被随机分组。临床表现为稳定型冠心病(69%)和急性冠状动脉综合征(31%)。SB支架直径(2.67±0.27mm)和长度(20.30±5.89mm)证实了SB病变的程度。手术成功率(临时策略组97%,裤裙边技术组94%)和球囊对吻扩张成功率(临时策略组95%,裤裙边技术组98%)都很高。临时策略组16%的患者接受了T支架置入术。主要终点(12个月时死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建的复合终点)在临时T支架组中发生率为7.7%,在裤裙边技术组中为10.3%(风险比为1.02;95%置信区间为0.78 - 1.34;P = 0.53)。手术时间、X线剂量和费用均有利于更简单的手术方式。
在治疗伴有严重狭窄边支的复杂冠状动脉分叉病变时,临时T支架策略与系统性双支架裤裙边策略在12个月时死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建的复合终点方面无差异。
网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT 01560455。