Bhan Amit, Clapp Brian
Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Interv Cardiol. 2014 Apr;9(2):115-120. doi: 10.15420/icr.2011.9.2.115.
A patent foramen ovale is a relatively common finding in the general population and is associated with a number of conditions, including cryptogenic stroke. In 2014, percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a frequently performed procedure; the bulk of these procedures being carried out for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke, along with other indications, such as prevention of decompression illness, platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome and migraine. Of these conditions the largest body of evidence available is for cryptogenic stroke and there is ongoing debate of the benefit of PFO closure over medical therapy. This article will review the available evidence of PFO closure in each of these contexts, with a particular focus on randomised controlled trials, and endeavour to outline in whom the evidence suggests closure should be considered.
卵圆孔未闭在普通人群中是相对常见的发现,并且与多种病症相关,包括不明原因的卒中。2014年,经皮卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术是一种经常实施的手术;这些手术大部分是为了不明原因卒中的二级预防而进行的,同时还有其他适应症,如预防减压病、平卧呼吸-直立性低氧血症综合征和偏头痛。在这些病症中,现有最多的证据是关于不明原因卒中的,并且对于PFO封堵术相对于药物治疗的益处一直存在争论。本文将回顾在每种情况下PFO封堵术的现有证据,特别关注随机对照试验,并努力概述证据表明应考虑进行封堵术的人群。