Suppr超能文献

一项评估髁上骨折治疗的多中心、协作性、闭环审计与英国骨科协会创伤标准11(BOAST 11)指南之间的比较。

Comparison between a multicentre, collaborative, closed-loop audit assessing management of supracondylar fractures and the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma 11 (BOAST 11) guidelines.

作者信息

Goodall R, Claireaux H, Hill J, Wilson E, Monsell F, Tarassoli P

机构信息

Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Senate House, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.

Oxford University Clinical Academic School, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2018 Mar 1;100-B(3):346-351. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0780.R2.

Abstract

AIMS

Supracondylar fractures are the most frequently occurring paediatric fractures about the elbow and may be associated with a neurovascular injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma 11 (BOAST 11) guidelines describe best practice for supracondylar fracture management. This study aimed to assess whether emergency departments in the United Kingdom adhere to BOAST 11 standard 1: a documented assessment, performed on presentation, must include the status of the radial pulse, digital capillary refill time, and the individual function of the radial, median (including the anterior interosseous), and ulnar nerves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stage 1: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective audit of adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1. Data were collected from eight hospitals in the United Kingdom. A total of 433 children with Gartland type 2 or 3 supracondylar fractures were eligible for inclusion. A centrally created data collection sheet was used to guide objective analysis of whether BOAST 11 standard 1 was adhered to. Stage 2: We created a quality improvement proforma for use in emergency departments. This was piloted in one of the hospitals used in the primary audit and was re-audited using equivalent methodology. In all, 102 patients presenting between January 2016 and July 2017 were eligible for inclusion in the re-audit.

RESULTS

Stage 1: Of 433 patient notes audited, adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1 was between 201 (46%) and 232 (54%) for the motor and sensory function of the individual nerves specified, 318 (73%) for radial pulse, and 247 (57%) for digital capillary refill time. Stage 2: Of 102 patient notes audited, adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1 improved to between 72 (71%) and 80 (78%) for motor and sensory function of the nerves, to 84 (82%) for radial pulse, and to 82 (80%) for digital capillary refill time. Of the 102 case notes reviewed in stage 2, only 44 (43%) used the quality improvement proforma; when the proforma was used, adherence improved to between 40 (91%) and 43 (98%) throughout.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to BOAST 11 standard 1 is poor in hospitals across the country. This is concerning as neurovascular deficit may be an indication for emergent surgery, and missed neurovascular injury can cause long-term, or even permanent, functional impairment. We present a simple proforma that improves adherence to this standard, can easily be implemented into emergency departments, and may improve patient safety. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:346-51.

摘要

目的

肱骨髁上骨折是肘部最常见的儿童骨折,可能伴有神经血管损伤。英国骨科协会创伤标准11(BOAST 11)指南描述了肱骨髁上骨折处理的最佳实践。本研究旨在评估英国的急诊科是否遵循BOAST 11标准1:在就诊时进行的记录评估必须包括桡动脉搏动情况、手指毛细血管再充盈时间,以及桡神经、正中神经(包括骨间前神经)和尺神经的个体功能。

材料与方法

第一阶段:我们对遵循BOAST 11标准1的情况进行了一项多中心回顾性审计。数据收集自英国的八家医院。共有433例Gartland 2型或3型肱骨髁上骨折患儿符合纳入标准。使用中央创建的数据收集表来指导对是否遵循BOAST 11标准1进行客观分析。第二阶段:我们创建了一份用于急诊科的质量改进表格。在初次审计所使用的其中一家医院进行了试点,并采用相同方法进行重新审计。2016年1月至2017年7月期间就诊的102例患者符合重新审计的纳入标准。

结果

第一阶段:在审核的433份患者病历中,对于指定的各神经运动和感觉功能,遵循BOAST 11标准1的比例在201例(46%)至232例(54%)之间,桡动脉搏动为318例(73%),手指毛细血管再充盈时间为例247(57%)。第二阶段:在审核的102份患者病历中,神经运动和感觉功能遵循BOAST 11标准1的比例提高到72例(71%)至80例(78%)之间,桡动脉搏动为84例(82%),手指毛细血管再充盈时间为82例(80%)。在第二阶段审核的102份病例记录中,只有44份(43%)使用了质量改进表格;使用该表格后,总体遵循率提高到40例(91%)至43例(98%)之间。

结论

全国各医院对BOAST 11标准1的遵循情况较差。这令人担忧,因为神经血管缺陷可能是急诊手术的指征,而遗漏神经血管损伤可能导致长期甚至永久性的功能损害。我们提出了一个简单的表格,可提高对该标准的遵循率,能轻松应用于急诊科,并可能提高患者安全性。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2018年;100 - B:346 - 51。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验