• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放型 Latarjet 手术在竞技运动员中比在娱乐性运动员中产生更好的结果:106 名年龄在 30 岁以下运动员的临床对比研究。

Open Latarjet Procedures Produce Better Outcomes in Competitive Athletes Compared With Recreational Athletes: A Clinical Comparative Study of 106 Athletes Aged Under 30 Years.

机构信息

Department of Shoulder Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Privé, Saint-Grégoire, France.

MC Grenoble Medical School, Biviers, France.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1408-1415. doi: 10.1177/0363546518759730. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1177/0363546518759730
PMID:29589955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cases of shoulder stabilization for anterior instability, the main goals of the surgery are a rapid and efficient return to sports and excellent long-term outcomes without recurrence of dislocation, particularly in young and competitive athletes.

PURPOSE

To determine whether outcomes of open Latarjet procedure (OLPs) depend on the level of sports practiced by patients and to report clinical scores and complication rates for OLP at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted for all patients who underwent OLP by the senior author (J.B.) between July 2007 and December 2012. The indication for OLP at the authors' institution was a minimum of 2 episodes of dislocation and/or subluxation, a positive apprehension test result in the cocking position, an Instability Severity Index Score more than 2, and evidence of anterior instability lesions on computed tomography arthrograms. The 106 included patients (110 shoulders) with a mean follow-up of 46 months were compared in 2 groups depending on sport activities: 57 (54%) competitive athletes and 49 (46%) recreational athletes. The principal outcome measure was evidence of recurrent instability. The secondary outcome measures were clinical scores related to anterior instability and related to sport practice: Rowe score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and level of satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 106 patients, 3 reported recurrence of shoulder dislocation: 2 competitive athletes (3.5%; 95% CI, 0.9%-11.2%) and 1 recreational athlete (2%; 95% CI, 0.4%-10.7%) ( P = .684). The persistent apprehension test result was positive in 7 competitive athletes (11.5%) and in 5 recreational athletes (10%) ( P = .566). The Rowe scores improved from 56.3 ± 13.2 (range, 30-80) preoperatively to 84.2 ± 16.4 (range, 30-100) postoperatively in competitive athletes and from 55.0 ± 11.0 (range, 35-80) to 69.5 ± 22.0 (range, 15-100) in recreational athletes ( P < .001). The net improvement in Rowe scores was significantly greater in competitive athletes (27.9 ± 21.7) compared with recreational athletes (14.5 ± 24.4) ( P = .006). The scores unrelated to sport activity (Oxford Shoulder Instability Score and Simple Shoulder Test) were similar for the 2 groups. All 57 (100%) competitive athletes and 34 (69.4%) recreational athletes resumed their previous sports practice, at the same level or higher than before their injury (respectively, 78.9% and 42.9%; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

The OLP could be considered for primary shoulder stabilization, particularly in competitive athletes, who have high functional demands and great risks of redislocation.

摘要

背景

在治疗肩关节前向不稳定时,手术的主要目标是快速、有效地恢复运动能力,避免再次脱位,并取得良好的长期效果,尤其是对于年轻且竞技状态活跃的运动员。

目的

探讨开放性 Latarget 术(OLP)的治疗效果是否与患者运动水平相关,并报告至少随访 2 年的 OLP 临床评分和并发症发生率。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究;证据等级 3 级。

方法

对作者(J.B.)于 2007 年 7 月至 2012 年 12 月期间进行的所有 OLP 患者进行回顾性比较研究。作者所在机构进行 OLP 的适应证为:至少有 2 次脱位和/或半脱位病史,前向撞击试验 Cocking 位阳性,不稳定严重程度指数评分>2 分,以及 CT 关节造影显示有前向不稳定的证据。106 例患者(110 个肩关节)接受了 OLP 治疗,平均随访 46 个月。根据运动活动情况将患者分为 2 组:57 例(54%)竞技运动员和 49 例(46%)休闲运动员。主要结局指标为复发性不稳定的证据。次要结局指标包括与前向不稳定和运动实践相关的临床评分:Rowe 评分、牛津肩不稳定评分(OSIS)、西部安大略肩不稳定指数和满意度。

结果

在 106 例患者中,3 例(3.5%;95%CI,0.9%-11.2%)报告出现肩关节再脱位,其中 2 例为竞技运动员(3.5%),1 例为休闲运动员(2%)(P =.684)。7 例竞技运动员(11.5%)和 5 例休闲运动员(10%)持续存在前向撞击试验阳性(P =.566)。竞技运动员的 Rowe 评分从术前的 56.3 ± 13.2(范围,30-80)改善至术后的 84.2 ± 16.4(范围,30-100),休闲运动员的 Rowe 评分从术前的 55.0 ± 11.0(范围,35-80)改善至术后的 69.5 ± 22.0(范围,15-100)(P<.001)。竞技运动员的 Rowe 评分改善程度明显大于休闲运动员(27.9 ± 21.7)(P =.006)。与运动活动无关的评分(牛津肩不稳定评分和简单肩试验)在 2 组之间相似。57 例(100%)竞技运动员和 34 例(69.4%)休闲运动员均恢复了之前的运动水平,或高于受伤前的运动水平(分别为 78.9%和 42.9%;P =.004)。

结论

OLP 可作为肩关节初次稳定治疗的选择,尤其是对功能需求高、再脱位风险大的竞技运动员。

相似文献

1
Open Latarjet Procedures Produce Better Outcomes in Competitive Athletes Compared With Recreational Athletes: A Clinical Comparative Study of 106 Athletes Aged Under 30 Years.开放型 Latarjet 手术在竞技运动员中比在娱乐性运动员中产生更好的结果:106 名年龄在 30 岁以下运动员的临床对比研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1408-1415. doi: 10.1177/0363546518759730. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
2
Similar Results in Return to Sports, Recurrences, and Healing Rates Between the Classic and Congruent-Arc Latarjet for Athletes With Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability and a Failed Stabilization.经典型与弧形吻合型 Latarjet 术治疗复发性肩关节不稳定合并初次稳定失败者的运动恢复、复发和愈合率结果相似
Arthroscopy. 2020 Sep;36(9):2367-2376. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Modified Latarjet Procedure Without Capsulolabral Repair for the Treatment of Failed Previous Operative Stabilizations in Athletes.改良 Latarjet 术(未修复关节囊和盂唇)治疗运动员复发性肩关节前脱位失败
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1421-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
5
Clinical Outcomes Following the Latarjet Procedure in Contact and Collision Athletes.接触性和碰撞性运动员行 Latarjet 手术后的临床疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Mar 21;100(6):459-465. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00566.
6
Modified Latarjet Without Capsulolabral Repair in Rugby Players With Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability and Significant Glenoid Bone Loss.橄榄球运动员复发性盂肱前向不稳定伴明显盂骨量丢失行改良 Latarjet 术而不修复关节囊及盂唇。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):795-800. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749586. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Outcomes of Latarjet Versus Distal Tibia Allograft for Anterior Shoulder Instability Repair: A Matched Cohort Analysis.Latarjet 术与胫骨远端同种异体移植物治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效比较:一项匹配队列分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1030-1038. doi: 10.1177/0363546517744203. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Are the Classic and the Congruent Arc Latarjet Procedures Equally Effective for the Treatment of Recurrent Shoulder Instability in Athletes?经典型和一致型喙突锁骨端固定术治疗运动员复发性肩关节不稳定的疗效是否相当?
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2081-2089. doi: 10.1177/0363546520928343. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Clinical outcomes following open anterior shoulder stabilization for glenohumeral instability in the young collision athlete.年轻碰撞运动员盂肱关节不稳定行开放性前肩稳定术后的临床结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jul;31(7):1474-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.013. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
The open latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic bankart repair.就肩部稳定性而言,开放Latarjet手术比关节镜下Bankart修复术更可靠。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2345-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Screw Removal Versus Unrevised Patients Following Open Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Analysis.复发性前肩不稳开放性Latarjet手术后取出螺钉与未翻修患者的长期临床结果:配对分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Aug 4;13(8):23259671251353768. doi: 10.1177/23259671251353768. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Clinical Outcomes Affecting Return to Play Following Latarjet Procedure in Young Contact and Limited Contact Athletes.影响年轻接触性和有限接触性运动员Latarjet手术后恢复运动的临床结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 20;12(8):23259671241265029. doi: 10.1177/23259671241265029. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Arthroscopic Latarjet yields better union and prevention of instability compared to arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability: a systematic review.
关节镜下Latarjet手术与关节镜下骨性Bankart修复术相比,在复发性前肩关节不稳的治疗中能获得更好的愈合及预防不稳:一项系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5994-6005. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07655-x. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
4
Outcomes After Open Latarjet in Patients With or Without SLAP Lesions.有或无SLAP损伤患者行开放性Latarjet手术后的结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 31;11(7):23259671231185199. doi: 10.1177/23259671231185199. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Previously failed Bankart repair and the duration from first dislocation to surgery were the risk factors associated with the level of return to sports after coracoid transfer.先前失败的 Bankart 修复术和首次脱位至手术的时间间隔是与喙突转移术后重返运动水平相关的危险因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Sep;31(9):4052-4059. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07453-5. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Open Latarjet Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Treatment of Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in High-Demand Patients With Minimal Glenoid Bone Loss.对于盂肱关节骨量丢失极少的高需求患者,开放性Latarjet手术与关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗创伤性前肩关节不稳的比较
Cureus. 2023 Apr 4;15(4):e37127. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37127. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Quality of life following an open Latarjet-Bristow procedure in a general population with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.普通人群复发性前肩不稳行开放性Latarjet-Bristow手术后的生活质量
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 17;7(2):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Is sling immobilization necessary after open Latarjet surgery for anterior shoulder instability? A randomized control trial.开放式 Latarjet 手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位后是否需要吊带固定?一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Feb 27;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07180-9.
9
[Short-term effectiveness of modified arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with double EndoButtons for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation].[采用双EndoButton改良关节镜下Latarjet手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 15;36(9):1072-1077. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202204127.
10
Glenoid bone augmentation: a contemporary and comprehensive systematic review of open procedures.肩胛盂骨增量术:开放性手术的当代综合系统评价
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Aug 30;14(3):37834. doi: 10.52965/001c.37834. eCollection 2022.