• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉医护人员对智能手机应用程序的使用情况。

Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers.

作者信息

Green Michael S, Mathew Johann J, Gundigi Venkatesh Archana, Green Parmis, Tariq Rayhan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 N. 15th Street, Suite 7502, MS 310, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2018 Feb 8;2018:8694357. doi: 10.1155/2018/8694357. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/8694357
PMID:29593787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5822814/
Abstract

Health care-related apps provide valuable facts and have added a new dimension to knowledge sharing. The purpose of this study is to understand the pattern of utilization of mobile apps specifically created for anesthesia providers. Smartphone app stores were searched, and a survey was sent to 416 anesthesia providers at 136 anesthesiology residency programs querying specific facets of application use. Among respondents, 11.4% never used, 12.4% used less than once per month, 6.0% used once per month, 12.1% used 2-3 times per month, 13.6% used once per week, 21% used 2-3 times per week, and 23.5% used daily. Dosage/pharmaceutical apps were rated the highest as most useful. 24.6% of the participants would pay less than $2.00, 25.1% would pay $5.00, 30.3% would pay $5-$10.00, 9.6% would pay $10-$25.00, 5.1% would pay $25-$50.00, and 5.1% would pay more than $50.00 if an app saves 5-10 minutes per day or 30 minutes/week. The use of mobile phone apps is not limited to reiterating information from textbooks but provides opportunities to further the ever-changing field of anesthesiology. Our survey illustrates the convenience of apps for health care professionals. Providers must exercise caution when selecting apps to ensure best evidence-based medicine.

摘要

医疗相关应用程序提供了有价值的信息,并为知识共享增添了新的维度。本研究的目的是了解专门为麻醉医护人员创建的移动应用程序的使用模式。我们搜索了智能手机应用商店,并向136个麻醉学住院医师培训项目的416名麻醉医护人员发送了一份调查问卷,询问应用程序使用的具体方面。在受访者中,11.4%的人从未使用过,12.4%的人每月使用次数少于一次,6.0%的人每月使用一次,12.1%的人每月使用2 - 3次,13.6%的人每周使用一次,21%的人每周使用2 - 3次,23.5%的人每天使用。剂量/药物应用程序被评为最有用。如果一款应用程序每天能节省5 - 10分钟或每周节省30分钟,24.6%的参与者愿意支付不到2.00美元,25.1%的人愿意支付5.00美元,30.3%的人愿意支付5 - 10.00美元,9.6%的人愿意支付10 - 25.00美元,5.1%的人愿意支付25 - 50.00美元,5.1%的人愿意支付超过50.00美元。手机应用程序的使用不仅限于重复教科书中的信息,还为推动不断变化的麻醉学领域提供了机会。我们的调查说明了应用程序对医疗保健专业人员的便利性。医护人员在选择应用程序时必须谨慎,以确保采用最佳的循证医学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/5291df5a606e/ARP2018-8694357.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/b713c983b5ed/ARP2018-8694357.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/d23368e6291d/ARP2018-8694357.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/a74527a939b2/ARP2018-8694357.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/0f800c76d756/ARP2018-8694357.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/5291df5a606e/ARP2018-8694357.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/b713c983b5ed/ARP2018-8694357.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/d23368e6291d/ARP2018-8694357.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/a74527a939b2/ARP2018-8694357.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/0f800c76d756/ARP2018-8694357.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd9/5822814/5291df5a606e/ARP2018-8694357.005.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of Smartphone Applications by Anesthesia Providers.麻醉医护人员对智能手机应用程序的使用情况。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2018 Feb 8;2018:8694357. doi: 10.1155/2018/8694357. eCollection 2018.
2
Use of mobile apps: a patient-centered approach.移动应用程序的使用:以患者为中心的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):765-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12675. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons.骨科医生用的智能手机应用程序。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):2042-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1904-0. Epub 2011 May 6.
4
Acceptance of mHealth among health professionals: a case study on anesthesia practitioners.医疗专业人员对移动健康的接受度:以麻醉从业者为例的案例研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 3;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00958-3.
5
A systematic review of smartphone applications for smoking cessation.一项关于戒烟智能手机应用程序的系统评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):292-299. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0492-2.
6
The Characteristics and Quality of Mobile Phone Apps Targeted at Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Window of Opportunity for Health Information Dissemination?中国面向男男性行为者的手机应用程序的特征和质量:健康信息传播的契机?
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 27;7(3):e12573. doi: 10.2196/12573.
7
Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Response: There's An App for That.应急准备与灾害应对:有一款应用程序能解决这个问题。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):486-90. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005099. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Health apps usage and preferences among Saudi patients with diabetes: A survey.沙特糖尿病患者对健康应用程序的使用情况及偏好:一项调查。
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 May;73(5):e13345. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13345. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality.用于双相情感障碍的移动应用程序:功能与内容质量的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 17;17(8):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4581.
10
Smartphone apps for snoring.治疗打鼾的智能手机应用程序。
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Oct;129(10):974-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115001978. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Effectiveness of a Clinical Decision Support Tool in Reducing Pediatric Opioid Dose Calculation Errors: PediPain App vs. Traditional Calculators - A Simulation-Based Randomised Controlled Study.比较临床决策支持工具在减少儿科阿片类药物剂量计算错误方面的有效性:PediPain 应用程序与传统计算器——基于模拟的随机对照研究。
J Med Syst. 2024 Apr 17;48(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02060-4.
2
The Internet, Apps, and the Anesthesiologist.互联网、应用程序与麻醉医生
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;11(22):3000. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11223000.
3
Resident Engagement With a Web- and App-based Journal Club Curriculum Utilizing Email and Text Notifications.

本文引用的文献

1
mHealth and mobile medical Apps: a framework to assess risk and promote safer use.移动健康与移动医疗应用程序:评估风险并促进安全使用的框架
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 15;16(9):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3133.
2
Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits.面向医疗保健专业人员的移动设备和应用程序:用途与益处。
P T. 2014 May;39(5):356-64.
3
How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice.如何在临床实践中识别、评估和应用移动医疗应用程序。
住院医师通过电子邮件和短信通知参与基于网络和应用程序的期刊俱乐部课程。
J Educ Perioper Med. 2023 Jul 1;25(3):E713. doi: 10.46374/volxxv_issue3_Walsh. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
4
From Socrates to Virtual Reality: A Historical Review of Learning Theories and Their Influence on the Training of Anesthesiologists.从苏格拉底到虚拟现实:学习理论及其对麻醉医师培训影响的历史回顾
J Educ Perioper Med. 2020 Apr 1;22(2):E638. doi: 10.46374/volxxii-issue2-Caruso. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
5
Acceptance of mHealth among health professionals: a case study on anesthesia practitioners.医疗专业人员对移动健康的接受度:以麻醉从业者为例的案例研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 3;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00958-3.
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;68(2):155-62. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12375.
4
Effect of behavioral intervention using smartphone application for preoperative anxiety in pediatric patients.使用智能手机应用程序对儿科患者术前焦虑进行行为干预的效果。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Dec;65(6):508-18. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6.508. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
5
The regulation of mobile medical applications.移动医疗应用的监管。
Lab Chip. 2014 Mar 7;14(5):833-40. doi: 10.1039/c3lc51235e.
6
Applying surgical apps: Smartphone and tablet apps prove useful in clinical practice.应用手术类应用程序:智能手机和平板电脑应用程序在临床实践中证明是有用的。
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;98(11):10-8.
7
The Meaning of Information Technology (IT) Mobile Devices to Me, the Infectious Disease Physician.信息技术(IT)移动设备对我这位传染病医生的意义。
Infect Chemother. 2013 Jun;45(2):244-51. doi: 10.3947/ic.2013.45.2.244.
8
Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to evaluation of mobile clinical applications.了解你的应用程序:一种基于证据的移动临床应用程序评估方法。
J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24(3):38-40. doi: 10.1097/01367895-201324030-00008.
9
Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews.医疗保健专业人员使用手持计算机的有效性证据:系统评价的范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 28;15(10):e212. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2530.
10
Regulating medical apps: which ones and how much?规范医疗应用程序:哪些应用程序以及规范到何种程度?
BMJ. 2013 Oct 8;347:f6009. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6009.