• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院网络:如何使其在比利时发挥作用?不同治理模式的促进因素和障碍。

Hospital networks: how to make them work in Belgium? Facilitators and barriers of different governance models.

作者信息

De Pourcq Kaat, De Regge Melissa, Van den Heede Koen, Van de Voorde Carine, Gemmel Paul, Eeckloo Kristof

机构信息

a Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Service Management , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.

b Strategic Policy Cell , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Clin Belg. 2018 Oct;73(5):333-340. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1457196. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1080/17843286.2018.1457196
PMID:29595095
Abstract

Objectives This study aims to identify the facilitators and barriers to governance models of hospital collaborations. The country-specific characteristics of the Belgian healthcare system and legislation are taken into account. Methods A case study was carried out in six Belgian hospital collaborations. Different types of governance models were selected: two health systems, two participant-governed networks, and two lead-organization-governed networks. Within these collaborations, 43 people were interviewed. Results All structures have both advantages and disadvantages. It is important that the governance model fits the network. However, structural, procedural, and especially contextual factors also affect the collaborations, such as alignment of hospitals' and professionals' goals, competition, distance, level of integrated care, time needed for decision-making, and legal and financial incentives. Conclusion The fit between the governance model and the collaboration can facilitate the functioning of a collaboration. The main barriers we identified are contextual factors. The Belgian government needs to play a major role in facilitating collaboration.

摘要

目标 本研究旨在确定医院合作治理模式的促进因素和障碍。研究考虑了比利时医疗保健系统和立法的国别特点。方法 在比利时的六个医院合作项目中开展了一项案例研究。选择了不同类型的治理模式:两个卫生系统、两个参与者主导的网络和两个牵头组织主导的网络。在这些合作项目中,对43人进行了访谈。结果 所有结构都有优缺点。治理模式与网络相匹配很重要。然而,结构、程序,尤其是背景因素也会影响合作,如医院与专业人员目标的一致性、竞争、距离、综合护理水平、决策所需时间以及法律和财务激励措施。结论 治理模式与合作之间的匹配可以促进合作的运作。我们确定的主要障碍是背景因素。比利时政府需要在促进合作方面发挥主要作用。

相似文献

1
Hospital networks: how to make them work in Belgium? Facilitators and barriers of different governance models.医院网络:如何使其在比利时发挥作用?不同治理模式的促进因素和障碍。
Acta Clin Belg. 2018 Oct;73(5):333-340. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1457196. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
Varying viewpoints of Belgian stakeholders on models of interhospital collaboration.比利时利益相关者对医院间协作模式的不同观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3763-9.
3
The introduction of hospital networks in Belgium: The path from policy statements to the 2019 legislation.比利时医院网络的引入:从政策声明到 2019 年立法的路径。
Health Policy. 2019 Jul;123(7):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
From corporate governance to hospital governance. Authority, transparency and accountability of Belgian non-profit hospitals' board and management.从公司治理到医院治理。比利时非营利性医院董事会与管理层的权力、透明度及问责制。
Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.009.
5
The role of governance in different types of interhospital collaborations: A systematic review.治理在不同类型医院间协作中的作用:系统评价。
Health Policy. 2019 May;123(5):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
6
Unravelling collaborative governance dynamics within healthcare networks: a scoping review.揭示医疗保健网络中协作治理的动态:范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):412-428. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae005.
7
Managing cancer care through service delivery networks: The role of professional collaboration in two European cancer networks.通过服务提供网络管理癌症护理:专业协作在两个欧洲癌症网络中的作用。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2018 Aug;31(3):120-129. doi: 10.1177/0951484817745219. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Translational networks in healthcare? Evidence on the design and initiation of organizational networks for knowledge mobilization.医疗保健中的转化网络?关于知识调动组织网络设计和启动的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
Network governance forms in healthcare: empirical evidence from two Italian cancer networks.医疗保健领域的网络治理形式:来自两个意大利癌症网络的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1018. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05867-2.
10
A network of networks.网络之网络。
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Apr 10;31(2):223-236. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2016-0146.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking the black box of interprofessional collaboration within healthcare networks: a scoping review.剖析医疗网络中跨专业协作的黑箱:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 13;15(6):e101702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101702.
2
Unravelling collaborative governance dynamics within healthcare networks: a scoping review.揭示医疗保健网络中协作治理的动态:范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):412-428. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae005.
3
Varying viewpoints of Belgian stakeholders on models of interhospital collaboration.比利时利益相关者对医院间协作模式的不同观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3763-9.