Dieter H H, Müller L, Abel J, Summer K H
Institute of Toxicology, University of Düsseldorf, FRG.
Experientia Suppl. 1987;52:351-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-6784-9_33.
Five current methods of metallothionein (MT)-estimation in biological materials (Hg/TCA-, Cd/heme-, SH-assay, G 75-method and RIA) were compared. Uniform calibration was ensured by measuring the nitrogen-content of the standard-apoprotein after "Kjeldahl-digestion". Known amounts of rabbit standard Cd-MT I were recovered from identical rat S9-samples. In an overall rating, RIA and Cd/heme-assay performed best, whereas the other methods either underestimated (SH-, G 75) or overestimated (Hg/TCA) the 100%-expectation.
比较了目前用于生物材料中金属硫蛋白(MT)测定的五种方法(汞/三氯乙酸法、镉/血红素法、巯基测定法、G75法和放射免疫分析法)。通过“凯氏定氮消化”后测量标准脱辅基蛋白的氮含量来确保统一校准。从相同的大鼠S9样品中回收已知量的兔标准镉-MT I。总体评价中,放射免疫分析法和镉/血红素测定法表现最佳,而其他方法要么低估了(巯基测定法、G75法),要么高估了(汞/三氯乙酸法)预期的100%。