Marina del Rey, CA; Louisville, KY; New York, NY; Campbell, CA; Minneapolis, MN; and Santa Barbara, CA.
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Southern California School of Medicine; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Louisville, and Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Kentucky; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College; Private Practice; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Minnesota, and North Memorial Hospital; and Clinical and Medical Affairs, Sientra, Inc.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):7S-19S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004350.
BACKGROUND: In March 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved Sientra's application for premarket approval of its portfolio of round and shaped silicone gel breast implants based on data from the largest silicone gel breast implant study to date. This article presents the results of Sientra's Core Study at the conclusion of 10 years. METHODS: The Sientra Core Study was a 10-year, open-label, prospective, multicenter clinical study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's breast implants in augmentation and reconstruction. A total of 1,788 patients (3,506 implants) were enrolled, including 1,116 primary augmentation, 363 revision-augmentation, 225 primary reconstruction, and 84 revision-reconstruction. RESULTS: Across all cohorts, the rate of rupture by patient was 8.6%, the rate of Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture was 13.5%, and the rate of reoperation was 31.5%. The rate of capsular contracture was statistically significantly lower for textured devices [9.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-11.5%] compared with smooth devices (17.5%; 95% CI, 14.9-20.4%). There were no cases of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Primary reasons for reoperations included capsular contracture (18.8%), and style/size change (19.3%), with over 50% of the reoperations due to cosmetic reasons. CONCLUSION: The 10-year results of Sientra's Core Study support a comprehensive safety and effectiveness profile of Sientra's portfolio of round and shaped breast implants.
背景:2012 年 3 月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准了 Sientra 公司的圆形和形状硅胶凝胶乳房植入物组合产品的上市前批准申请,该申请基于迄今为止最大的硅胶凝胶乳房植入物研究的数据。本文介绍了 Sientra 核心研究在 10 年后的结果。
方法:Sientra 核心研究是一项为期 10 年、开放标签、前瞻性、多中心临床研究,旨在评估 Sientra 乳房植入物在隆胸和重建中的安全性和有效性。共纳入 1788 名患者(3506 个植入物),包括 1116 例原发性隆胸、363 例修复性隆胸、225 例原发性重建和 84 例修复性重建。
结果:在所有队列中,患者的破裂率为 8.6%,贝克 III/IV 级包膜挛缩率为 13.5%,再次手术率为 31.5%。与光滑装置(17.5%;95%置信区间[95%CI],14.9-20.4%)相比,纹理装置的包膜挛缩率(9.0%;95%CI,7.0-11.5%)统计学上显著降低。没有发生乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的病例。再次手术的主要原因包括包膜挛缩(18.8%)和样式/大小改变(19.3%),其中超过 50%的再次手术是出于美容原因。
结论:Sientra 核心研究的 10 年结果支持 Sientra 圆形和形状乳房植入物组合产品的全面安全性和有效性。
Aesthet Surg J. 2018-2-17
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025-7-22
JAMA Netw Open. 2023-12-1
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024-1-1
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022-12-7
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023-6