Kim Da-Som, Moon Yi-Jun, Lee Hyung-Chul, Chung Jae-Ho, Jung Seung-Pil, Yoon Eul-Sik
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Korea University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):987-998. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-70. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
Capsular contracture is one of the most common and severe complications after implant-based breast reconstruction. Recently, prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become an alternative to subpectoral implant-based reconstruction. However, risk factors for capsular contracture associated with recent prepectoral reconstruction trends are not well refined yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine risk factors for capsular contracture, and share our experience of treating capsular contracture in prepectoral reconstruction.
This retrospective comparative study focused on 110 patients who underwent prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with ADM. Risk factors of capsular contracture were analyzed by comparing a capsular contracture group (27 cases) and a non-capsular contracture group (83 cases). Secondary treatment after capsular contracture development was analyzed in capsular contracture group.
According to univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for capsular contracture, single staged implant-based reconstruction (direct-to-implant), infection, and postoperative radiotherapy were significantly related to the development of capsular contracture. Also, surgical intervention including capsulectomy and capsulotomy with implant change showed a significant higher remission rate than other groups.
Our study provides insights into risk factors and treatment choices for capsular contracture after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with ADM. These findings can aid selection of patients, postoperative care and preventative treatment before reconstruction.
包膜挛缩是植入式乳房重建术后最常见且严重的并发症之一。近来,使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)的胸肌前植入式乳房重建已成为胸肌下植入式重建的一种替代方法。然而,与近期胸肌前重建趋势相关的包膜挛缩风险因素尚未得到充分明确。因此,本研究的目的是确定包膜挛缩的风险因素,并分享我们在胸肌前重建中治疗包膜挛缩的经验。
这项回顾性比较研究聚焦于110例行胸肌前ADM植入式乳房重建的患者。通过比较包膜挛缩组(27例)和无包膜挛缩组(83例)分析包膜挛缩的风险因素。对包膜挛缩组包膜挛缩发生后的二次治疗进行分析。
根据对包膜挛缩风险因素的单因素和多因素分析,单阶段植入式重建(直接植入)、感染和术后放疗与包膜挛缩的发生显著相关。此外,包括包膜切除术和更换植入物的包膜切开术在内的手术干预显示缓解率显著高于其他组。
我们的研究为ADM胸肌前植入式乳房重建术后包膜挛缩的风险因素和治疗选择提供了见解。这些发现有助于重建前患者的选择、术后护理和预防性治疗。