相似文献
1
US science agencies set to win big in budget deal.
Nature. 2018 Mar 29;555(7698):572. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03700-9.
2
High stakes for US science.
Nature. 2012 Oct 25;490(7421):453-5. doi: 10.1038/490453a.
3
Trump budget would slash science programmes across government.
Nature. 2017 May 23;546(7656):19-20. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.22036.
4
Biomedical agency feels the pinch--again.
Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):130.
5
Cuts loom for US science.
Nature. 2012 Jul 24;487(7408):414-5. doi: 10.1038/487414a.
6
U.S. budget. Science spared from domestic spending freeze--for now.
Science. 2010 Feb 5;327(5966):628-30. doi: 10.1126/science.327.5966.628.
7
Science gets little love in Trump spending plan.
Science. 2017 May 26;356(6340):795. doi: 10.1126/science.356.6340.795.
8
Beware the anti-science label.
Nature. 2017 May 10;545(7653):133-134. doi: 10.1038/545133b.
9
Trump science budget sows confusion.
Nature. 2018 Feb 15;554(7692):284-285. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-01985-4.
10
U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):466-7. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6221.466.
引用本文的文献
1
How can we discover the most valuable types of big data and artificial intelligence-based solutions? A methodology for the efficient development of the underlying analytics that improve care.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01682-9.
2
Economic evaluations of big data analytics for clinical decision-making: a scoping review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1466-1475. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa102.
Zotero 插件