• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性皮下脓肿治疗中引流联合抗生素与单纯引流的对比研究

Comparative Study of Drainage and Antibiotics versus Drainage Only in the Management of Primary Subcutaneous Abscesses.

作者信息

López Julio, Gómez Gilberto, Rodriguez Karime, Dávila Julio, Núñez José, Anaya Luis

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, Mexican Institute of Social Security , Delicias, Mexico .

2 Emergency Department, Mexican Institute of Social Security , Delicias, Mexico .

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):345-351. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.225. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2017.225
PMID:29596040
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin and soft tissue infections are common problems dealt with in emergency departments and medical offices. It is routine practice to prescribe antibiotic agents after incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses. However, current evidence does not support prescribing oral antibiotic agents after surgical debridement. The aim of the present study was to determine the actual role of antibiotic agents after drainage of cutaneous abscesses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study of patients undergoing incision and drainage (I&D) of a subcutaneous abscess. Patients were randomly assigned either to receive antibiotic agents (group 1) or placebo (group 2) after I&D. The primary end point was resolution rate of the abscess at the seventh day. Secondary end points were pain at the seventh day and total time to full healing of the wound. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-five patients were included for analysis. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities did not differ substantially between groups. Chest and peri-anal abscesses were statistically more frequent in group 2, whereas neck abscesses were more frequent in group 1 (p = 0.02). Leukocyte count was also statistically higher in group 1 (p = 0.005). Resolution rate was 96% in group 1 and 93% in group 2, with no statistical difference between both (p = 0.28). Neither pain at seventh day nor time to full healing differed statistically between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic agents are not necessary for uncomplicated subcutaneous abscesses after I&D. These cases can be managed safely on an outpatient basis without any increase in morbidity.

摘要

背景

皮肤和软组织感染是急诊科和医务室常见的问题。在切开引流皮肤脓肿后开具抗生素是常规做法。然而,目前的证据并不支持在手术清创后开具口服抗生素。本研究的目的是确定皮肤脓肿引流后抗生素的实际作用。

患者与方法

这是一项对接受皮下脓肿切开引流术(I&D)患者的前瞻性研究。患者在I&D后被随机分配接受抗生素(第1组)或安慰剂(第2组)。主要终点是脓肿在第7天的消退率。次要终点是第7天的疼痛情况以及伤口完全愈合的总时间。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

165例患者纳入分析。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和合并症方面无显著差异。第2组胸部和肛周脓肿在统计学上更为常见,而第1组颈部脓肿更为常见(p = 0.02)。第1组白细胞计数在统计学上也更高(p = 0.005)。第1组的消退率为96%,第2组为93%,两组之间无统计学差异(p = 0.28)。两组在第7天的疼痛情况和完全愈合时间在统计学上均无差异。

结论

对于I&D后的非复杂性皮下脓肿,抗生素并非必需。这些病例可在门诊安全处理,且发病率不会增加。

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Drainage and Antibiotics versus Drainage Only in the Management of Primary Subcutaneous Abscesses.原发性皮下脓肿治疗中引流联合抗生素与单纯引流的对比研究
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;19(3):345-351. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.225. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
A comparison of traditional incision and drainage versus catheter drainage of soft tissue abscesses in children.传统切开引流与导管引流治疗儿童软组织脓肿的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Oct;46(10):1942-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.05.025.
3
Does adjuvant antibiotic treatment after drainage of anorectal abscess prevent development of anal fistulas? A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study.引流后辅助抗生素治疗是否可预防肛门直肠脓肿发展为肛瘘?一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、多中心研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Aug;54(8):923-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821cc1f9.
4
An alternative to open incision and drainage for community-acquired soft tissue abscesses in children.一种替代开放性切开引流术的方法,用于治疗儿童社区获得性软组织脓肿。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Mar;46(3):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.019.
5
A high-vacuum wound drainage system reduces pain and length of treatment for pediatric soft tissue abscesses.高真空伤口引流系统可减轻小儿软组织脓肿的疼痛并缩短治疗时间。
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;176(2):261-267. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2835-2. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Antibiotic therapy in the treatment of skin abscess meta-analysis.抗生素治疗皮肤脓肿的荟萃分析。
Rozhl Chir. 2021 Summer;100(7):325-329. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2021.100.7.325-329.
7
Antibiotic Duration, but Not Abscess Size, Impacts Clinical Cure of Limited Skin and Soft Tissue Infection After Incision and Drainage.抗生素疗程而非脓肿大小影响切开引流有限皮肤和软组织感染的临床治愈。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 27;71(3):661-663. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1129.
8
The role of adjunctive antibiotics in the treatment of skin and soft tissue abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助抗生素在皮肤和软组织脓肿治疗中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CJEM. 2015 Jul;17(4):420-32. doi: 10.1017/cem.2014.52. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
Prospective observational study to assess the need for postoperative antibiotics following surgical incision and drainage of skin and soft tissue abscess in pediatric patients.一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估儿科患者皮肤和软组织脓肿切开引流术后对抗生素的需求。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;53(8):1469-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
Twelve hundred abscesses operatively drained: an antibiotic conundrum?一千二百例脓肿进行手术引流:抗生素难题?
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):794-8; discussion 798-800. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Purulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections, Challenging the Practice of Incision and Drainage: A Scoping Review.脓性皮肤和软组织感染:对切开引流实践的挑战——一项范围综述
Nurs Res Pract. 2023 Oct 6;2023:5849141. doi: 10.1155/2023/5849141. eCollection 2023.
2
Antibiotic prescribing patterns in Emergency Department at Regional Hospital in South Africa.南非地区医院急诊科的抗生素处方模式。
Afr Health Sci. 2021 Dec;21(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i4.19.