Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Tower Hamlets Community Learning Disability Service, Mile End Hospital, London, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Mar;22(15):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta22150.
BACKGROUND: Preliminary studies have indicated that training staff in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) may help to reduce challenging behaviour among people with intellectual disability (ID). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether or not such training is clinically effective in reducing challenging behaviour in routine care. The study also included longer-term follow-up (approximately 36 months). DESIGN: A multicentre, single-blind, two-arm, parallel-cluster randomised controlled trial. The unit of randomisation was the community ID service using an independent web-based randomisation system and random permuted blocks on a 1 : 1 allocation stratified by a staff-to-patient ratio for each cluster. SETTING: Community ID services in England. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (aged > 18 years) across the range of ID with challenging behaviour [≥ 15 Aberrant Behaviour Checklist - Community total score (ABC-C)]. INTERVENTIONS: Manual-assisted face-to-face PBS training to therapists and treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU only in the control arm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Carer-reported changes in challenging behaviour as measured by the ABC-C over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included psychopathology, community participation, family and paid carer burden, family carer psychopathology, costs of care and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Data on main outcome, service use and health-related quality of life were collected for the 36-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 246 participants were recruited from 23 teams, of whom 109 were in the intervention arm (11 teams) and 137 were in the control arm (12 teams). The difference in ABC-C between the intervention and control arms [mean difference -2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.79 to 4.51; = 0.528] was not statistically significant. No treatment effects were found for any of the secondary outcomes. The mean cost per participant in the intervention arm was £1201. Over 12 months, there was a difference in QALYs of 0.076 in favour of the intervention (95% CI 0.011 to 0.140 QALYs) and a 60% chance that the intervention is cost-effective compared with TAU from a health and social care cost perspective at the threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. Twenty-nine participants experienced 45 serious adverse events (intervention arm, = 19; control arm, = 26). PBS plans were available for 33 participants. An independent assessment of the quality of these plans found that all were less than optimal. Forty-six qualitative interviews were conducted with service users, family carers, paid carers and service managers as part of the process evaluation. Service users reported that they had learned to manage difficult situations and had gained new skills, and carers reported a positive relationship with therapists. At 36 months' follow-up ( = 184), the mean ABC-C difference between arms was not significant (-3.70, 95% CI -9.25 to 1.85; = 0.191). The initial cost-effectiveness of the intervention dissipated over time. LIMITATIONS: The main limitations were low treatment fidelity and reach of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the main study and the naturalistic follow-up suggest that staff training in PBS as delivered in this study is insufficient to achieve significant clinical gains beyond TAU in community ID services. Although there is an indication that training in PBS is potentially cost-effective, this is not maintained in the longer term. There is increased scope to develop new approaches to challenging behaviour as well as optimising the delivery of PBS in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered as NCT01680276. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 22, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
背景:初步研究表明,对员工进行积极行为支持(Positive Behaviour Support,PBS)培训可能有助于减少智障人士(ID)的挑战性行为。 目的:评估在常规护理中,这种培训是否在减少挑战性行为方面具有临床效果。该研究还包括了更长时间的随访(约 36 个月)。 设计:一项多中心、单盲、两臂、平行组随机对照试验。随机单位是使用独立的基于网络的随机系统和随机排列块对每个集群进行 1:1 分配的社区 ID 服务,按每个集群的员工与患者的比例进行分层。 设置:英格兰的社区 ID 服务。 参与者:具有挑战性行为的成年 ID 患者(年龄>18 岁)[≥15 项异常行为检查表-社区总分(ABC-C)]。 干预措施:向治疗师提供手动辅助的面对面 PBS 培训,以及对照组仅接受常规治疗。 主要观察指标:在 12 个月内,照顾者报告的挑战性行为变化,以 ABC-C 衡量。次要结局包括精神病理学、社区参与、家庭和有偿照顾者负担、家庭照顾者精神病理学、护理成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。在 36 个月的随访中收集了主要结局、服务使用和健康相关生活质量的数据。 结果:从 23 个团队中招募了 246 名参与者,其中 109 名在干预组(11 个团队),137 名在对照组(12 个团队)。干预组和对照组之间 ABC-C 的差异[平均差异-2.14,95%置信区间(CI)-8.79 至 4.51;=0.528]无统计学意义。没有发现任何次要结局的治疗效果。干预组每名参与者的平均成本为 1201 英镑。在 12 个月内,干预组在 QALYs 方面有 0.076 的差异,有利于干预(95%CI 0.011 至 0.140 QALYs),从健康和社会护理成本的角度来看,与 TAU 相比,在获得每 QALY 20000 英镑的阈值下,干预的成本效益有 60%的可能性。29 名参与者经历了 45 次严重不良事件(干预组=19;对照组=26)。为 33 名参与者制定了 PBS 计划。对这些计划质量的独立评估发现,所有计划都不够理想。作为过程评估的一部分,对服务使用者、家庭照顾者、有偿照顾者和服务经理进行了 46 次定性访谈。服务使用者报告说,他们已经学会了处理困难情况,并获得了新的技能,照顾者报告说与治疗师建立了积极的关系。在 36 个月的随访(=184)中,两组之间的 ABC-C 差异无显著意义(-3.70,95%CI-9.25 至 1.85;=0.191)。干预的初始成本效益随着时间的推移而消散。 局限性:主要的局限性是治疗的忠实度和干预的覆盖范围较低。 结论:主要研究和自然随访的结果表明,在这项研究中,社区 ID 服务中提供的员工 PBS 培训不足以在 TAU 之外取得显著的临床效果。尽管有迹象表明 PBS 培训具有潜在的成本效益,但这种效果在长期内无法维持。有更多的空间来开发新的挑战性行为方法,并优化 PBS 在常规临床实践中的应用。 试验注册:这项研究由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,并将在 ; Vol. 22, No. 15 中全文发表。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。
Health Technol Assess. 2019-3
Health Technol Assess. 2019-4
Health Technol Assess. 2024-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-2-6
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2020-2