Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
School of Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) is an individualised, person-centred intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia that addresses the impact of cognitive impairment on everyday functioning. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether or not CR is a clinically effective and cost-effective intervention for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease or vascular or mixed dementia, and their carers. DESIGN: This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared CR with treatment as usual (TAU). Following a baseline assessment and goal-setting to identify areas of everyday functioning that could be improved or better managed, participants were randomised (1 : 1) via secure web access to an independent randomisation centre to receive either TAU or CR and followed up at 3 and 9 months post randomisation. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Participants had an , Tenth Edition, diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or vascular or mixed dementia, had mild to moderate cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥ 18 points), were stable on medication if prescribed, and had a family carer who was willing to contribute. The exclusion criteria were people with a history of brain injury or other neurological disorder and an inability to speak English. To achieve adequate power, we needed 350 people to complete the trial, with 175 people in each trial arm. INTERVENTION: Cognitive rehabilitation consisted of 10 therapy sessions over 3 months, followed by four maintenance sessions over 6 months, delivered in participants' homes. The therapists were nine occupational therapists and one nurse. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self-reported goal attainment at 3 months. Goal attainment was also assessed at 9 months. Carers provided independent ratings of goal attainment at both time points. The secondary outcomes were participant quality of life, mood, self-efficacy and cognition, and carer stress, health status and quality of life. The assessments at 3 and 9 months were conducted by researchers who were blind to the participants' group allocation. RESULTS: A total of 475 participants were randomised (CR arm, = 239; TAU arm, = 236), 427 participants (90%) completed the trial and 426 participants were analysed (CR arm, = 208, TAU arm, = 218). At 3 months, there were statistically significant large positive effects for participant-rated goal attainment [mean change in the CR arm: 2.57; mean change in the TAU arm: 0.86; Cohen's = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 1.19], corroborated by carer ratings (Cohen's = 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.34). These effects were maintained at 9 months for both the participant ratings (Cohen's = 0.94, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and the carer ratings (Cohen's = 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.20). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. In the cost-utility analyses, there was no evidence of cost-effectiveness in terms of gains in the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the person with dementia (measured using the DEMentia Quality Of Life questionnaire utility score) or the QALYs of the carer (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, three-level version) from either cost perspective. In the cost-effectiveness analyses, by reference to the primary outcome of participant-rated goal attainment, CR was cost-effective from both the health and social care perspective and the societal perspective at willingness-to-pay values of £2500 and above for improvement in the goal attainment measure. There was no evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the self-efficacy measure (the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale) from either cost perspective. LIMITATIONS: Possible limitations arose from the non-feasibility of using observational outcome measures, the lack of a general measure of functional ability and the exclusion of people without a carer or with rarer forms of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive rehabilitation is clinically effective in enabling people with early-stage dementia to improve their everyday functioning in relation to individual goals targeted in the therapy sessions. FUTURE WORK: Next steps will focus on the implementation of CR into NHS and social care services and on extending the approach to people with rarer forms of dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21027481. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 23, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
背景:认知康复(CR)是一种针对轻度至中度痴呆症患者的个体化、以患者为中心的干预措施,旨在解决认知障碍对日常功能的影响。
目的:确定认知康复是否对轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病、血管性或混合性痴呆症患者及其照料者具有临床有效性和成本效益。
设计:这项多中心随机对照试验将认知康复与常规治疗(TAU)进行比较。在基线评估和设定目标以确定可以改善或更好管理的日常功能领域后,参与者通过安全的网络访问被随机(1:1)分配到独立的随机分组中心,接受 TAU 或 CR 治疗,并在随机分组后 3 个月和 9 个月进行随访。
地点:社区。
参与者:参与者患有第十版阿尔茨海默病或血管性或混合性痴呆症的诊断,有轻度至中度认知障碍(迷你精神状态检查分数≥18 分),如果有药物治疗则稳定,并有愿意参与的家庭照料者。排除标准为有脑损伤或其他神经障碍病史以及无法说英语的人。为了达到足够的效力,我们需要 350 人完成试验,每组 175 人。
干预措施:认知康复包括 10 次治疗,持续 3 个月,然后进行 6 个月的 4 次维持治疗,在参与者家中进行。治疗师由 9 名职业治疗师和 1 名护士组成。
结局指标:主要结局指标是 3 个月时的自我报告目标达成情况。目标达成情况也在 9 个月时进行评估。照料者在这两个时间点都提供了目标达成情况的独立评分。次要结局指标是参与者的生活质量、情绪、自我效能感和认知,以及照料者的压力、健康状况和生活质量。3 个月和 9 个月的评估由对参与者分组分配不知情的研究人员进行。
结果:共有 475 名参与者被随机分配(CR 组,n=239;TAU 组,n=236),427 名参与者(90%)完成了试验,426 名参与者被分析(CR 组,n=208;TAU 组,n=218)。在 3 个月时,参与者自评目标达成情况有统计学上显著的较大积极影响[CR 组的平均变化:2.57;TAU 组的平均变化:0.86;Cohen's d=0.97,95%置信区间(CI)0.75 至 1.19],这一结果得到了照料者评分的证实(Cohen's d=1.11,95% CI 0.89 至 1.34)。这些效果在 9 个月时对参与者评分(Cohen's d=0.94,95% CI 0.71 至 1.17)和照料者评分(Cohen's d=0.96,95% CI 0.73 至 1.20)都得到了维持。次要结局指标没有显著差异。在成本-效用分析中,从痴呆症患者(使用 DEMentia Quality Of Life 问卷效用评分衡量)的生活质量调整后年数(QALY)或照料者(使用 EuroQol-5 维度,三级版本衡量)的 QALY 角度来看,没有证据表明认知康复具有成本效益。在成本效果分析中,根据参与者自评目标达成情况这一主要结局指标,从健康和社会保健角度以及从支付意愿角度来看,在愿意支付 2500 英镑或以上以改善目标达成情况的情况下,认知康复具有成本效益。从成本角度来看,没有关于自我效能感衡量指标(一般自我效能感量表)的成本效益证据。
局限性:可能存在由于无法使用观察性结局测量、缺乏一般功能能力衡量指标以及排除没有照料者或罕见形式痴呆症的患者而产生的局限性。
结论:认知康复在使早期痴呆症患者改善与治疗课程中针对的个人目标相关的日常功能方面具有临床有效性。
未来工作:下一步将专注于将认知康复纳入国民保健制度和社会保健服务,并将该方法扩展到罕见形式的痴呆症患者。
试验注册:当前对照试验 ISRCTN21027481。
资金:本项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,将在;第 23 卷,第 10 期。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。
Health Technol Assess. 2019-3
Health Technol Assess. 2019-4
Health Technol Assess. 2020-5
Health Technol Assess. 2019-9
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025-7-18
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2025-4-15
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024-11-25