Saqr Mohammed
E-learning Unit, Qassim University - College of Medicine, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018 Mar-Apr;12(2):80-85.
The number of publications in the field of medical education is still markedly low, despite recognition of the value of the discipline in the medical education literature, and exponential growth of publications in other fields. This necessitates raising awareness of the research methods and potential benefits of learning analytics (LA). The aim of this paper was to offer a methodological systemic review of empirical LA research in the field of medical education and a general overview of the common methods used in the field in general. Search was done in Medline database using the term "LA." Inclusion criteria included empirical original research articles investigating LA using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methodologies. Articles were also required to be written in English, published in a scholarly peer-reviewed journal and have a dedicated section for methods and results. A Medline search resulted in only six articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria for this review. Most of the studies collected data about learners from learning management systems or online learning resources. Analysis used mostly quantitative methods including descriptive statistics, correlation tests, and regression models in two studies. Patterns of online behavior and usage of the digital resources as well as predicting achievement was the outcome most studies investigated. Research about LA in the field of medical education is still in infancy, with more questions than answers. The early studies are encouraging and showed that patterns of online learning can be easily revealed as well as predicting students' performance.
尽管医学教育文献中认可该学科的价值,且其他领域的出版物呈指数增长,但医学教育领域的出版物数量仍然明显偏低。这就需要提高对学习分析(LA)研究方法和潜在益处的认识。本文的目的是对医学教育领域的实证性学习分析研究进行方法学系统综述,并对该领域普遍使用的常见方法进行总体概述。使用 “LA” 一词在Medline数据库中进行搜索。纳入标准包括使用定性、定量或混合方法研究学习分析的实证原创研究文章。文章还要求用英文撰写,发表在学术同行评审期刊上,并有专门的方法和结果部分。Medline搜索仅得到六篇符合本综述纳入标准的文章。大多数研究从学习管理系统或在线学习资源中收集有关学习者的数据。两项研究中的分析大多使用定量方法,包括描述性统计、相关性测试和回归模型。大多数研究调查的结果是在线行为模式和数字资源的使用情况以及预测成绩。医学教育领域关于学习分析的研究仍处于起步阶段,问题多于答案。早期研究令人鼓舞,表明在线学习模式以及预测学生表现都很容易揭示。